The study is a prospective multi-centre observational study to evaluate a portable magnetocardiograph device for the rule-out of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients who present to the emergency department with chest pain and other symptoms consistent with ACS.
Few, if any, studies have evaluated the rule-out (R/O) of non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) ACS which requires the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of the test to approach 100%. An alternative triage approach, utilizing a portable magnetocardiography (MCG) instrument in the emergency setting, may lead to a more accurate R/O for NSTEMI, UA, and clinically significant non-ACS coronary artery disease (CAD), in patients presenting to the ED with chest pain. MCG in the emergency setting is a new use of this non-invasive technique and may serve as an adjunctive aid that can improve cardiac triage for NSTE ACS and clinically significant CAD.This raises the research question of whether MCG may be useful for the early triage of patients with acute chest pain. In the study protocol, a clinical evaluation is defined that will assess the ability of a portable MCG instrument, using a fixed algorithm, to R/O ACS, with improved safety (i.e. \<\< 2% false negative rate) in patients presenting to an emergency setting with chest pain.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
756
A passive, non-contact, mobile medical device that measures, displays, stores, and retrieves magnetic fluctuations caused by heart activity at a patient's bedside.
Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust
Bristol, United Kingdom
Leicester Royal Infirmary, Univeristy Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Leicester, United Kingdom
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham Univeristy Hospitals NHS Trust
Nottingham, United Kingdom
Sensitivity and specificity of MCG
Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing ACS, focusing on rule-out, in chest pain patients with normal sinus rhythm
Time frame: at discharge, 3 months follow-up
Proportion of adverse events and types
Time frame: at discharge, 3 months follow-up
All-cause mortality (divided into CV and non-CV causes) proportion
Time frame: through 1 week and 3 months follow-up
Change in sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing ACS, focusing on rule-out, in chest pain patients with normal sinus rhythm, according to low, intermediate and high PTP groups
Time frame: at discharge, 3 months follow-up
MACE post-presentation to the ED (rule-out of ACS divided into MCG vs reference standard [adjudicated ACS/non-ACS diagnose])
Time frame: through 1 week and 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Northern General Hospital
Sheffield, United Kingdom