The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of high-dose corticosteroid pulses added to conventional oral corticosteroid course for moderate flares of ulcerative colitis.
Oral corticosteroids (CS) are the treatment of choice for moderate flares of ulcerative colitis (UC) in patients who are on 5-aminosalicylic acid (5ASA) maintenance therapy. However, the efficacy of oral CS is limited, with up to 50% of remission rate in the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). By the other hand, uncompleted disease remission after CS use, that is, clinical but not endoscopic remission, has been associated with a higher risk of hospitalizations and need for immunomodulator or colectomy in UC. Uncontrolled data suggests that intravenous CS (IV CS) may increase the remission rate and also reduce the proportion of patients developing steroid-dependency after the index course of CS. The hypothesis of this study is that the addition of a 3-day high-dose IV CS pulses schedule administered in the outpatient infusion unit, added to a conventional oral CS course increases the endoscopic remission rate and reduces the 1-year proportion of patients developing steroid-dependency. This is a randomized, phase IV, open-label, multicenter, controlled study. The planned number of patients to be included is 148, distributed in two treatment arms (with or without initial high-dose CS pulse), and stratified regarding disease onset and mesalazine use. The main end-point will be the proportion of patients with steroid-free, clinical and endoscopic remission at 8 and 54 weeks, with no rescue therapies. The demonstration of a higher efficacy of the proposed treatment schedule would impact on a lower requirement for conventional immunosuppressive therapy (thiopurines) and biological agents, reduced hospitalizations and surgery. Moreover, this treatment regimen allows an outpatient management of moderate flares. Baseline characteristics will be analyzed by descriptive statistical analysis by conventional methods. Categorical variables will be compared using Mann-Whitney test and continuous variables by Student T test. In order to evaluate the primary endpoint a Chi square test will be performed to compare the proportions of patients in both study groups that achieved clinical and endoscopic steroid-free remission at 8 weeks and is maintained without steroids or salvage therapy and with no rescue therapy up to 54 weeks. Per protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (IT) analysis will be made The Per Protocol analysis will include all participants who did adequately adhere to the protocol, in particular those who did received the total amount of the intervention. Missing outcomes data will be treated as non-response imputation (NRI). The intention-to treat-analysis will only include all randomized patients in the analysis, all retained in the group to which they were allocated, except those patients with missing outcomes that did not completed treatment regimen due to SAE criteria or treatment failure. In order to evaluate the secondary endpoints a Chi square test and a Student T test will be performed for both study groups. Cumulative probabilities of relapse, steroid dependency and surgery will be evaluated in both groups by Kaplan-Meiery, and compared by using log-rank test. Finally, association analysis of early clinical response, clinical and endoscopic remission at week 8 and week 8 and 54 will be performed by chi-square test and Student T test; those variables that reach a Pvalue ≤ 0.1 will be included in the logistic regression analysis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
75
Intravenous bolus of methylprednisolone 0.5g/day for 3 consecutive days followed by a decreasing conventional course of oral prednisone (week1; 60mg/d, w2; 50mg/d, w3;40mg/d, w4; 30mg/d, w5; 20mg/d, w6; 15mg/d, w7; 10mg/d, w8; 5 mg/d, w9; 0mg/d)
Conventional course of oral prednisone (week1; 60mg/d, w2; 50mg/d, w3;40mg/d, w4; 30mg/d, w5; 20mg/d, w6; 15mg/d, w7; 10mg/d, w8; 5 mg/d, w9; 0mg/d)
Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic and Clincal Remission
The percentage of patients with steroid-free, endoscopic remission, with no rescue therapies. It has been measured by Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES). MES= 0 (no friability and granularity and intact vascular pattern). MES= 1 (mild erythema or decreased vascular pattern). MES= 2 (marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, and erosions). MES= 3 (spontaneous bleeding and ulceration)
Time frame: Change from baseline at week 8
Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic and Clinical Remission
The proportions of patients with steroid-free, endoscopic remission, with no rescue therapies. It has been measured by Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES). MES= 0 (no friability and granularity and intact vascular pattern). MES= 1 (mild erythema or decreased vascular pattern). MES= 2 (marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, and erosions). MES= 3 (spontaneous bleeding and ulceration)
Time frame: Change from baseline at week 54
Percentage of Patients With Clinical Remission
It was measured as a decrease in the Mayo index score from baseline of at least 3 points; and a decrease of at least 30% in the rectal bleeding variable of at least 1 point or with an absolute value of 0 or 1. The Mayo index score is composed of four parts: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment, and endoscopy appearance. Each part is rated from 0 to 3, giving a total score of 0 to 12. A score of 3 to 5 points indicates mildly active disease, a score of 6 to 10 points indicates moderately active disease, and a score of 11 to 12 points indicates severely active disease.
Time frame: Change from baseline at week 8.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Adverse events (AEs) were collected during the study, from informed consent until the last visit.
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
Althaia, xarxa assistencial universitaria de Manresa
Manresa, Barcelona, Spain
Consorci Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí
Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Moisès Broggi
Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain
Consorci Hospitalari de Terrassa
Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital de Galdakao
Galdakao, Bilbao, Spain
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander, Cantabria, Spain
hospital Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Ourense
Ourense, Ourense, Spain
...and 19 more locations
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events
Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) were defined as any adverse event or adverse drug reaction that resulted in death, is life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or caused a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Time frame: 12 months
Levels of C-reactive Protein
Clinical assessments included the analytical laboratory test. Blood samples were taken for haematology, and C-reactive protein (mg/L) levels were measured.
Time frame: Baseline
Levels of Serum Albumin
Clinical assessments included the analytical laboratory test. Blood samples were taken for haematology, and Serum albumin determination.
Time frame: Baseline
Levels of Faecal Calprotectin
Faecal samples were collected at baseline, frozen and stored at -20 Celsius degrees (ºC) for central measurement of faecal calprotectin (FC).
Time frame: Baseline