Nowadays, there is no clinical and radiological study comparing two different types of mobile implants in patients requiring surgical treatment for symptomatic cervical disc disease. Thus, the choice of the ideal implant remains uncertain. The goal of this work is to compare the impact of two types of mobile implants in height drives, solicitation facets, positioning and collection of prostheses within the intervertebral spaces.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
37
Mobi-C Prothesis, LDR Medical (company)
ProDisc-C prothesis, Vivo Depuy Synthes (company)
CHR d'ORLEANS
Orléans, France
Hôpital Bretonneau, CHU DE TOURS
Tours, France
Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) between the two groups
Time frame: Baseline
Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) between the two groups
Time frame: 3 months
Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) between the two groups
Time frame: 1 year
Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) between the two groups
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.