The aim is to design, implement and evaluate new person-centred transitions between stroke units and the home. The development of person-centred transition will be performed together by people with stroke, significant others, stroke unit staff and interdisciplinary teams. Phase 1, a prospective observational study of current transitions from stroke units to rehabilitation in the home without coordination. The aim is to identify factors that are facilitators or barriers to transitions, patient and caregiver outcomes, use of health care during the first year after stroke. In phase 2, a co-design process of new person-centred transitions will be carried out by people with stroke, significant others, stroke unit staff and interdisciplinary home rehabilitation teams. In phase 3 new person-centred transitions will be implemented and evaluated in a feasibility study.
A phased approach, as recommended for development and evaluation of complex interventions, will be used. In phase 1 the current transitions from stroke units to the home environment will be explored and facilitators / barriers to coordinated person-centred safe transitions will be identified. Knowledge generated in phase 1 will inform phase 2; a co-design process of new coordinated person-centred car transitions conducted by people with stroke, significant others and staff from stroke units and interdisciplinary home rehabilitation teams together. Knowledge from phase 1 and phase 2 will inform phase 3; implementation and feasibility evaluation of the new care transitions. Phase 1 Aims: Explore current state of care transitions combined with rehabilitation in the home, identify facilitators and barriers to person-centred transitions, current patient and caregiver outcome, satisfaction, and resource use of health services during the first year after stroke. Design: prospective longitudinal observational study. 1. Participants: people with mild/moderate stroke, referred from stroke units to home rehabilitation and their significant others will be asked to participate before discharge from the stroke unit. Data collection: Baseline data on medical and socio-demographic aspects and functioning will be collected from the medical records. Data on satisfaction with the transition process will be collected after discharge from the stroke unit. At 3, and 12 months people with stroke will be assessed regarding disability, perceived impact of stroke, participation in social activities, health related quality of life, perceived needs of health services and satisfaction with services received using reliable validated measures and structured interviews. Data on caregiver burden, life satisfaction and informal care will be collected from significant others. Data on use of health care will be obtained from the register at Region Stockholm. Analyses: Statistical analyses to identify factors at baseline associated with satisfactory transitions, and associations between perceived quality of transitions and patient and significant other outcomes at 3 and 12 months. 2. Participants: staff of stroke units and interdisciplinary home rehabilitation teams. Data collection: Focus group interviews with staff of stroke units on experiences of identifying candidates for home rehabilitation, the planning and decisions; and with the interdisciplinary teams on experiences of preparation for rehabilitation in the home and establishing new contacts with people referred for home rehabilitation. Analyses: Grounded theory. 3. Participants: Strategic samples of people with stroke based on satisfaction with transition and their significant others. Data collection: Semistructured individual interviews on the experiences of the transition from the stroke unit to the home and the initiation of the home rehabilitation. Analyses: Grounded theory. Phase 2 Aims: Develop new person-centred coordinated transitions. Design: Workshops with all stakeholders using a collaborative design process which include reflection, analysis, and description of the problem, visualization to get a common picture, modelling and/or prototyping. Participants: People with stroke, significant others, staff from stroke units and interdisciplinary home rehabilitation teams in a series of five workshops. Data collection: field-notes, diaries and documentation of the design process. Phase 3 Aims: Implement and evaluate the new person-centred transitions between stroke units and the home in a feasibility study regarding satisfaction with the transitions, patient and caregiver outcomes and use of health care during the first year after stroke and explore experiences of the new transitions from all stakeholders involved. a) Design: cluster non-randomized controlled feasibility study. Participants: people with mild/moderate stroke, referred from stroke units to home rehabilitation and their significant others will be asked to participate before discharge from the stroke unit. The intervention will be implemented at a geriatric stroke unit and an acute stroke unit at Danderyd Hospital and two corresponding home rehabilitatin teams in Stockholm, Sweden. The controls will be recruited from an acute stroke unit at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. In total, 50 persons will be consecutively included, 25 from the intervention site and 25 from the control site. In addition, staff of the participating stroke units and interdisciplinary teams will be recruited. Data collection: Data on feasibility, operationalised as fidelity and acceptability, of the intervention will be collected by participant observations, interviews, and data from the healthcare record. Data on likely effectiveness will be collected using questionnaires and registry data: 1. Sociodemographic and disease-related data will be collected from hospital records and cognitive function, depression, and fatigue in structured interviews. One week after discharge data will be collected on the primary outcome satisfaction with the transition process, and the secondary outcomes patient health literacy, medication adherence, fatigue, depresion symptoms. At 3 months, data will be collected on health literacy, medication adherence, fatigue, depresion symptoms, self-efficacy, perceived stroke recovery, activities of daily living, and satisfaction with care. All data will be collected using validated questionnaires. 2. Semi-structured interviews will be held with a purposive sampling of about 10 patients, and about 10 healthcare professionals. For people with stroke, the interviews will be conducted one-week after discharge. For professionals, the interviews will be conducted 1 to 3 months after start of intervention. a) Analyses: Patients in the intervention group will be compared to control group using intention-to-treat analysis. b) Analyses: Qualitative content analysis
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
49
The intervention consists of several elements that aim to meet patients', significant others', and professionals' needs for shared understanding, patient preparedness for homecoming, and coordination.
Control group participants will receive current care transitions, initiated by an electronic referral from hospital healthcare professionals to the receiving neurorehabilitation team
Karolinska University Hospital
Huddinge, Sweden
Danderyd hospital
Stockholm, Sweden
Care Transition Measure
Questionnaire that assesses perceived quality in care transitions. The total score (0-100) reflects the overall perceived quality of the care transition, with lower scores indicating a poor quality care transition, and higher scores indicating a higher quality care transition.
Time frame: 1 week after discharge from hospital stroke unit
Health Literacy Questionnaire
Questionnaire that assesses health literacy. The Health Literacy Questionnaire contains 44 items, which are divided into nine areas of health literacy. The first five scales are scored on a 4-point Likert scale (ranging from strongly disagree to disagree, agree, and strongly agree), building part I. The other four scales, representing part II, are scored on a 5-point Likert scale where respondents are asked to rate the level of difficulty in undertaking a task (ranging from cannot do, always difficult, usually difficult, sometime difficult, usually easy, and always easy). Higher scores indicate better health literacy.
Time frame: 1 week and 3 months after inclusion
Stroke Impact Scale, perceived recovery (patient)
Perceived recovery after stroke is rated on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (no recovery) to 100 (full recovery).
Time frame: 1 week and 3 months after inclusion
The Medication Adherence Report Scale (patient)
Questionnaire that consists of 5 items that assesses medication adherence. Participants are asked to rate the frequency with which they engaged in each of the adherence-related behaviours on a five-point scale, where 5 = never, 4 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 2 = often and 1 = always. Scores for each item were summed to give a total score, with higher scores indicating higher levels of reported adherence.
Time frame: 1 week and 3 months after inclusion
General Self-Efficacy Scale (patient)
Questionnaire that assesses the strength of an individual's belief in his/her own ability to respond to novel or difficult situations and to deal with any associated obstacles or setbacks. The scale consists of 10 items rated on a four-point Likert scale ("not at all true" to "exactly true") where higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.
Time frame: 3 months after inclusion
Caregiver Burden Scale (significant other)
Questionnaire that consists of 22 items for different types of subjective caregiver burden, covering areas of the caregiver's health, feelings of psychological well-being, relations, social network, physical workload, and environmental aspects. The items are scored on a scale from 1 to 4 and the higher the score the greater the burden.
Time frame: 3 months after inclusion
EuroQol-5D Visual Analogue Scale (significant other)
The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20-centimeter vertical visual analog scale with end-points ranging from 0 to 100. The single global question in the EQ VAS asks the individual to label his/her health as "the worst health you can imagine" (0) to "the best health you can imagine"
Time frame: 3 months after inclusion
Life Satisfaction Checklist, item 1 (significant other)
Questionnaire that assesses life satisfaction with one global item "Life as a whole". Answering alternatives range from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied) where higher scores indicate a higher satisfaction.
Time frame: 3 months after inclusion
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.