Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have increased risk of seasonal influenza and influenza-related complications but have reduced vaccine immunogenicity. It is unknown whether patients with rheumatoid arthritis would benefit from more immunogenic vaccine formulations. This study investigated the immunogenicity and safety of a high-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-TIV) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared to a standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (SD-QIV).
Influenza, a vaccine-preventable respiratory disease, is ranked 8th among the causes of death in the Canadian population. Among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, the incidence of both seasonal influenza and serious influenza-related illness (IRI) are increased. Despite being a high priority group targeted for vaccination, the diagnosis of RA and other patient-specific factors (i.e. older age, treatment, current smoking) are linked to impaired vaccination responses. Thus the burden of influenza among people with RA is disproportionally high, and interventions to improve responses to influenza vaccination are urgently needed. Strategies to optimize protection in another vulnerable group, the elderly, include the use of quadrivalent vaccines, higher antigen doses, and adjuvants. A high-dose, trivalent, inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-TIV) has recently been shown to have a similar safety profile to standard dose vaccine (SD-TIV) with improved immunogenicity and protection in adults ≥65 years of age. Whether or not analogous strategies to improve responses to influenza vaccine will enhance protection in people with RA is unknown. The investigators hypothesize that the use of the HD-influenza vaccine will improve vaccine-induced protection (i.e. seroconversion and seroprotection) in people with RA compared to SD-influenza vaccine. The investigators propose to conduct a stratified, randomized, modified double blind, active-controlled trial to assess immune responses to two commercial influenza vaccines containing different antigen doses in individuals with RA.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Seroconversion Rate to HD- Versus SD-IV in People With RA
Seroconversion rate (SCR): proportion of subjects in a given treatment group (SD- or HD) with either a ≥4-fold increase in reciprocal HI titres between D0 and D28 or a rise of undetectable HI titre (i.e. \<1:10) pre-vaccination (D0) to an HI titre of ≥1:40 at D28 post vaccination.
Time frame: Day 28
Seroprotection Rate to HD- Versus SD-IV in People With RA
Seroprotection rate (SPR): the proportion of subjects in a given treatment group attaining a reciprocal HI titre of ≥1:40 at D28 post-vaccination.
Time frame: Day 28
Geometric Mean Titres (GMTs) of HI in People With RA Who Received HD- Versus SD-IV
Geometric mean titres (GMTs) of HI at D28.
Time frame: Day 28
Durability of Detectable Levels of HI Antibody for SD- and HD- IV.
Number of participants with detectable HI antibodies at Day 186
Time frame: Day 186
Rates of Side Effects During the Surveillance Period in SD- and HD-IV.
Number of Participants with Side Effects
Time frame: Day 28
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
279