This study is a randomized controlled double-blinded multi-center clinical trial enrolling female hip fracture patients who are 65 and older. It will compare the effects of six months of supervised exercise training combined with daily topical testosterone gel, to six months of supervised exercise and inactive gel, and to Enhanced Usual Care. The randomization protocol is that for every nine participants randomized, 4 will be assigned to the topical testosterone gel and supervised exercise training group; 4 will be assigned to topical inactive gel and supervised exercise training group; and 1 will be assigned to the enhanced usual care group. All participants will receive nutritional counseling, and calcium and vitamin D supplements.
Hip fractures are common among older women and can have a devastating impact on their ability to remain independent. A clinically important functional decline and failure to recover following a hip fracture has been documented as late as a year after the fracture, even among women who were functioning at high levels before the event. Age-associated androgen deficiency in women contributes to deficits in muscle mass, strength and power that are common in this patient population before the fracture, and are exacerbated afterward. A pilot study of testosterone (T) supplementation in elderly female hip fracture patients has demonstrated the feasibility of T treatment in this population, and showed gains in lean body mass (LBM) and muscle strength with active drug, compared to placebo. The benefits of exercise in restoring muscle strength and physical function after a hip fracture have been documented. However, it remains unclear whether T treatment can augment the effects of exercise on mobility and patient-reported function after hip fracture. The STEP-HI study is a 3-group, multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, parallel group clinical trial in older female hip fracture patients. Between 120 and 168 female hip fracture patients, age 65 years and older, will be randomized from multiple clinical sites in the USA, using objective screening criteria for T deficiency (serum total testosterone level \< 60 ng/dL) and physical frailty (Modified Physical Performance Test (PPT) Score of 12-28). The primary study aim is to compare supervised exercise training (EX) with inactive (placebo) gel (EX+P) and EX combined with T therapy (EX+T), to ascertain the incremental impact of adding T to EX in older adult women with a recent hip fracture. The study team will carefully monitor testosterone levels, adverse events, biochemical parameters, and factors related to adherence to the interventions. Information from this study has the potential to alter treatment of hip fracture in older women, a problem that contributes to significant morbidity and mortality, and has a large public health impact. The STEP-HI study is highly aligned with NIA's mission of identifying interventions that target common geriatric conditions and improve treatment options for older adults with multiple morbidities or risk factors.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
129
Topical testosterone gel 1%
Inactive skin gel
Multicomponent exercise program focused primarily on progressive resistance exercise training
Flexibility exercises performed at home 3 times per week and reviewed by study staff once a month.
30-40 minute presentations conducted by study staff for participants focused on health concerns unrelated to exercise.
University of Colorado, Denver
Aurora, Colorado, United States
University of Connecticut Heath - UConn Health
Farmington, Connecticut, United States
University of Maryland School of Medicine/Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
HebrewSenior Life Harvard Medical School
Roslindale, Massachusetts, United States
Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB)
Galveston, Texas, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Change in Six Minute Walk Distance
Walking endurance was measured using a 6-Minute Walk Distance. Participants were asked to walk back and forth on a measured path marked clearly at both ends for turning purposes, while being told when each minute has passed, and receiving verbal encouragement every 60 seconds. Total distance was measured in meters with higher distances equating to higher walking endurance. Each individual participant distance from Baseline was subtracted from Month 6 to represent change over the length of the study. Higher positive values represent more improvement in walking distance. In addition to the primary analysis (unadjusted baseline to 6 month comparison), statistical contracts were evaluated to determine if there was significant between-group differences in the change from baseline to 3 months and additional analysis of covariance were performed to adjust for baseline values and covariates that differed across groups at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in Total Lean Body Mass
Total lean body mass measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Baseline DXA scans were completed prior to the first administration of study drug. All scans were completed prior to exercise or 1-RM measurements if scheduled for the same day. DXA scans were reviewed for quality control, proper positioning, and artifacts centrally. Each individual participant measure from Baseline was subtracted from Month 6 to represent change over the length of the study. Higher positive values represent more gains in total lean body mass. Per the protocol: In addition to the primary analysis (unadjusted baseline to 6 month comparison), additional analysis of covariance were performed to adjust for baseline values and covariates that differed across groups at baseline. DXA was not performed at 3 months.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in Appendicular Lean Body Mass
Lean body mass of the arms and legs, measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Baseline DXA scans were completed prior to the first administration of study drug. All scans were completed prior to exercise or 1-RM measurements if scheduled for the same day. DXA scans were reviewed for quality control, proper positioning, and artifacts centrally. Each individual participant measure from Baseline was subtracted from Month 6 to represent change over the length of the study. Higher positive values represent more gains in appendicular lean body mass. Per the protocol: In addition to the primary analysis (unadjusted baseline to 6 month comparison), additional analysis of covariance were performed to adjust for baseline values and covariates that differed across groups at baseline. DXA was not performed at 3 months.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in 1-repetition Maximum (1-RM) Leg Press Strength
Muscle strength measured as the maximal amount of weight that the participant was able to lift for one repetition (1-RM). The 1-RM is defined as the greatest resistance that could be overcome through a defined range of motion using proper techniques. Subjects were asked to move against progressively heavier resistance loads until a repetition failure was achieved. Each individual participant measure from Baseline was subtracted from Month 6 to represent change over the length of the study. Higher positive values represent the increased ability to lift more weight. Per the protocol: In addition to the primary analysis (unadjusted baseline to 6 month comparison), statistical contracts were evaluated to determine if there was significant between-group differences in the change from baseline to 3 months and additional analysis of covariance were performed to adjust for baseline values and covariates that differed across groups at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in Total Modified Physical Performance Test (mPPT) Score
A modified version of the Physical Performance Test (mPPT) was used to measure physical function. Participants were asked to complete 9 standardized tasks (book lift, putting on a lab coat, picking up a penny from the floor, standing balance, standing up five times from a 16-inch chair, 50 foot walk including a turn, 360 degree turn, stair climb for 10 steps, and climbing 2 additional flights of steps) for a total score ranging from 0 (significant impairment) to 36 (excellent functioning). Each individual participant score from Baseline was subtracted from Month 6 to represent change over the length of the study. Higher positive values represent more improvement in physical functioning.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Score
The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is a well validated objective physical performance measure used to identify risk for disability. The SPPB consists of: chair rise, progressive Romberg balance, and 4 meter gait speed. Each task was scored (0-4) with a total range of 0-12. Participants who score 0 are unable to complete the tasks and participants with higher scores are considered to have higher functional mobility. Each individual participant score from Baseline was subtracted from Month 6 to represent change over the length of the study. Higher positive values represent more improvement in physical performance. In addition to the primary analysis (unadjusted baseline to 6 month comparison), statistical contracts were evaluated to determine if there was significant between-group differences in the change from baseline to 3 months and additional analysis of covariance were performed to adjust for baseline values and covariates that differed across groups at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in Older Adult Resources and Services (OARS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Questionnaire
The OARS Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire Activities of Daily Living (ADL) is a standardized, valid and reliable, self-report questionnaire used to determine the effect of services on the functional status of older adults by asking respondents about their ability to perform ADLS on 2 subscales: Basic (BADL) and Instrumental (IADL). Both subscales are scored from 0 (significant impairment) to 14 (excellent functioning). The individual participant score from Baseline was subtracted from Month 6 to represent change over the length of the study. Higher positive values represent more improvement in functioning. In addition to the primary analysis (unadjusted baseline to 6 month comparison), statistical contracts were evaluated to determine if there was significant between-group differences in the change from baseline to 3 months and additional analysis of covariance were performed to adjust for baseline values and covariates that differed across groups at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in Functional Status Questionnaire (FSQ) Total Score
The Functional Status Questionnaire (FSQ) is a self-reported measure asking about the amount of difficulty a participant experienced when performing daily tasks in the previous 4 weeks. There are a total of 6 subscales, but only the basic ADL and Intermediate ADL were used in the STEP-HI study for a total of 9 items. Scores range from 0 (high amount of difficulty completing tasks) to 36 (no difficulty completing tasks). Per the protocol: In addition to the primary analysis (unadjusted baseline to 6 month comparison), statistical contracts were evaluated to determine if there was significant between-group differences in the change from baseline to 3 months and additional analysis of covariance were performed to adjust for baseline values and covariates that differed across groups at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in Hip Rating Questionnaire Total Score
The Hip Rating Questionnaire (HRQ) Standardized is a 14-item scale with weighted questions regarding quality of life (pain level and ability to walk) and function (ability to use stairs, put on socks/shoes, use public transportation, bathe, shop, do housework, and get in and out of a chair/bed) related to the hip fracture event. The scale scores range from 16 to 100. Higher scores are associated with less pain, higher function, and better quality of life. Per the protocol: In addition to the primary analysis (unadjusted baseline to 6 month comparison), statistical contracts were evaluated to determine if there was significant between-group differences in the change from baseline to 3 months and additional analysis of covariance were performed to adjust for baseline values and covariates that differed across groups at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Global Health instrument is a 10 item self report questionnaire used to measure overall quality of life using 2 summary scores: Physical and Mental Health. Each summary score is standardized to the general population, with the average T-score for the US population being 50 and standard deviation of 10. Each individual participant T-score from Baseline was subtracted from Month 6 T-score to represent change over the length of the study. Higher scores represent larger increases in Physical and Mental Health. Per the protocol: In addition to the primary analysis (unadjusted baseline to 6 month comparison), statistical contracts were evaluated to determine if there was significant between-group differences in the change from baseline to 3 months and additional analysis of covariance were performed to adjust for baseline values and covariates that differed across groups at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Non-fractured Proximal Femur
Bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the non-fractured proximal femur in participants without hardware in the contralateral hip. Baseline DXA scans were completed prior to the first administration of study drug. All scans were completed prior to exercise or 1-RM measurements if scheduled for the same day. DXA scans were reviewed for quality control, proper positioning, and artifacts centrally. Per the protocol: In addition to the primary analysis (unadjusted baseline to 6 month comparison), additional analysis of covariance were performed to adjust for baseline values and covariates that differed across groups at baseline. DXA was not performed at 3 months.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.