A randomized, controlled trial comparing exoskeleton gait training with standard gait training or no gait training in community-dwelling participants with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury
Community dwelling iSCI participants may improve clinical gait function by engaging in a gait training regimen, where robotic exoskeletons can readily deliver a precise dose and simultaneously reduce the physical stress imposed on therapists using conventional manually assisted stepping practice. Exoskeleton training is predicted to improve function in participants receiving usual care, but not superior to intensity-matched manual training. The rationale to implement exoskeleton robotics as preference in gait training is based on precision dosing, over-ground training, and reduced therapist burden for high repetition training. The investigators aim to demonstrate that Ekso exoskeleton training can significantly improve gait speed in stable chronic, community-dwelling incomplete SCI (iSCI) participants. The objectives of this study are the following: A. Primary Objective: To demonstrate that a 12 week robotic gait training regimen can lead to a clinically meaningful improvement in independent gait speed on the 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) in community dwelling participants with chronic iSCI. B. Secondary Objectives: 1. To examine the economic factors such as number of physical therapists/staff required during training. 2. To analyze the physical burden on therapists assisting and supervising during training. 3. To study the influence of factors that may modify the gait recovery in the chronic incomplete SCI population (demographic, clinical, functional, psychological, balance, etc.).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
45
Walking Improvement for Spinal Cord Injuries with Exoskeleton
Standard gait training using BWS PT and overground training
Barrow Neurological Institute at St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Gaylord Hospital
Wallingford, Connecticut, United States
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Change in Gait Speed From Baseline to 12 Weeks Using 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
The mean change in gait speed demonstrated during the 10MWT after 12 weeks of training and compared between groups. Positive values indicate improvement in gait speed (faster) from baseline to 12 weeks. Negative values indicate a reduction in gait speed (slower) from baseline to 12 weeks.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 Weeks
Number of Participants Who Met the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of 0.15m/s in Gait Speed Per 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) From Baseline to 24 Weeks
Number of participants who achieve the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of 0.15 m/s during the 10MWT when comparing between baseline gait speed and gait speed at 24 weeks.
Time frame: Between baseline and 24 weeks
Change in Distance Covered Over 6 Minutes From Baseline to 24 Weeks
6 minute walk test (6MWT) completed at baseline and 24 weeks. Change assessed. Positive values indicate an increase in distance was able to be walked at 24 weeks versus at baseline. Negative values indicate a decrease in distance was walked at 24 weeks versus at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline-24 weeks
Change in Time Required to Complete Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test From Baseline to 24 Week Follow up
Examined balance and walking in participants at baseline and follow up at 24 weeks. Positive values indicate an improvement of time (less time) required to complete task at 24 week follow up versus at baseline. Negative values indicate a decline, more time required to complete task at follow up versus baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Fall During Protocol
At each training session, assessed if participant had experienced any falls. Count is number of participants who reported that yes, they did experience a fall.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital
Wheaton, Illinois, United States
Kennedy Kruger Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Courage Kenny Research Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Kessler Foundation
West Orange, New Jersey, United States
Burke Medical Research Institute
White Plains, New York, United States
TIRR Memorial Hermann Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Time frame: Throughout 24 weeks
Change in Berg Balance Scale Score From Baseline to 24 Weeks
Measurement of static and dynamic sitting and standing balance completed at baseline and at 24 weeks. Berg balance scale is a 14 item test with each item scored from 0-4. Possible scores range from 0-56. Higher scores indicate a lower risk of falls and better balance. Positive numbers indicate an improvement in Berg balance scale (scored out of 56), meaning that the participant scored higher at 24 weeks than at baseline. Negative values indicate a decline in performance of the Berg balance scale (scored out of 56), meaning that the participant scored lower at 24 weeks than at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline-24 weeks