Within the last decade, urgent-start peritoneal dialysis(PD) has gained considerable interest amongst nephrologists. Several publications have provided assurances that urgent-start PD is indeed feasible and can serve patients well; however, most of the studies have small sample sizes, retrospective design, and the impact of the urgent-start dialysis modality on outcome, especially on short-term complications, has not been directly evaluated. Therefore, we started this multi-centered, prospective, interventional study compared the dialysis-related complications and survival rate directly between urgent-start PD and HD groups with a large sample to determine the feasibility and safety of urgent-start PD as an alternate initial modality of dialysis for patients who require urgent initiation of dialysis therapy.
The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is on the rise worldwide. Moreover, many patients who progress to ESRD, even with regular nephrology follow-up, do not have a distinct plan at the time of initiating dialysis therapy, resulting in an urgent need for dialysis. Urgent-start dialysis refers to urgent initiation of dialysis for ESRD patients with no pre-established functional vascular access or peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter. Hemodialysis (HD) is preferred in most centers with a high rate of central venous catheter (CVC) use at the time of initiating dialysis among HD patients. There is a significantly increased risk of infectious complications, thrombosis, and other complications associated with CVC use which negatively affects patient prognosis. Within the last decade, urgent-start PD has gained considerable interest amongst nephrologists. Several publications have provided assurances that urgent-start PD is indeed feasible and can serve patients well; however, most of the studies have small sample sizes, and the impact of the urgent-start dialysis modality on outcome, especially on short-term complications, has not been directly evaluated. Therefore, we conducted this multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial to compare the dialysis-related complications and survival rate directly between urgent-start PD and HD groups with a large sample to determine the feasibility and safety of urgent-start PD as an alternate initial modality of dialysis for patients who require urgent initiation of dialysis therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
116
Patients initiated peritoneal dialysis as urgent-start dialysis modality with a peritoneal dialysis catheter.
Patients initiated hemodialysis as urgent-start dialysis modality with a central venous catheter.
RenJi Hospital
Shanghai, China
the incidence of dialysis-related complications
the incidence of dialysis-related complications.Dialysis-related complications were defined as a composite of non-infectious complications (malposition, obstruction, leakage, hernia, bleeding, or thrombosis) and infectious complications (catheterrelated infection, exit-site infection, or peritonitis)
Time frame: 12 months
PD catheter technical survival rate
PD catheter technical survival rate
Time frame: 12 months
peritonitis-free survival rates
peritonitis-free survival rates
Time frame: 12 months
patient survival rate
patient survival rate
Time frame: 12 months
total medical cost of initial hospitalization
total medical cost of initial hospitalization
Time frame: 6 weeks
duration of initial hospitalization
duration of initial hospitalization
Time frame: 6 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.