Community Wise: An Innovative Multi-level Intervention to Reduce Alcohol and Illegal Drug Use

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign602 enrolled

Overview

The current project seeks to implement the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) and Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) principles to identify the most efficient, scalable, and sustainable combination of Community Wise components. Community Wise is a manualized multi-level intervention aimed at reducing health inequalities related to alcohol and illicit drug use (AIDU). The research will be conducted by the Newark Community Collaborative Board (NCCB), a network that developed and pilot-tested the original Community Wise. NCCB members include the principal investigators (PIs), co-investigators (Co-Is), service providers, consumers of AIDU, and community members. Specific aims include: Aim 1: Use a highly efficient experimental design to estimate the unique contribution of key components of Community Wise in: a) reducing AIDU frequency and b) increasing the percentage of participants abstinent over five months. Components tested are the presence or absence of: (a) Critical Dialogue; (b) Quality-of-Life-Wheel; (c) Capacity Building Project; and (d) group facilitation by a peer versus a licensed clinician. A factorial experiment will be used to detect effects of individual components and three-way interactions. Aim 2: Informed by MOST, Community Wise will be optimized for scalability and sustainability-- the most efficacious combination of components that can be delivered for less than $2000 per intervention cycle serving up to eleven individuals simultaneously (as per recommendations by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). This 2x2x2x2 factorial design will be fully powered to detect change in AIDU in a sample of 528 men with substance use disorders and a history of incarceration residing in distressed communities with predominantly Black populations. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of sixteen experimental conditions. The first eight conditions will be facilitated by a licensed facilitator. The remaining conditions will be facilitated by a peer facilitator. Each set of eight conditions will include the following components: (1) Critical Dialogue (CD) only; (2) Quality-of-Life-Wheel (QLW) only; (3) Capacity Building Project (CBP) only; (4) CD+QLW; (5) CD+CBP; (6) QLW+CBP; (7) CD+QLW+CBP; and (8) no components. Data will be collected at baseline plus five post-baseline monthly follow-ups. This study has potential to impact public health; the use of CBPR and MOST will generate action-oriented implications and an optimized multi-level intervention adaptable to address different health inequalities.

Interventions

Critical DialogueBEHAVIORAL

Prompted by thematic images, aims to help participants develop a deeper understanding of how marginalizing processes (e.g., systematic stigma; feelings of rage as victims of discrimination) impact participants' lives and behavior.

Capacity Building ProjectBEHAVIORAL

Designed to create collaborative efforts to overcome and dismantle marginalizing processes by building positive social and organizational relationships and community capacity through the development and implementation of community projects aiming to address social determinants of health.

Quality of Life WheelBEHAVIORAL

Aims to increase self-efficacy and help participants develop a vision for their future, breaking this vision down into small, feasible, measureable goals they can implement on a weekly basis (e.g. quitting smoking, improving relationships with family members, paying down debt).

PFBEHAVIORAL

Whether the intervention is delivered by a peer facilitator.

LCBEHAVIORAL

Whether the intervention is delivered by a licensed clinician.

Eligibility

Sex: MALEMin age: 18 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: Inclusion criteria for the factorial experiment participants in the study will include: * Men age 18 or older * Residence in Essex County, NJ * Willingness to be voice recorded during group sessions * Ability to speak English * Having a substance use disorder measured by the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs-Substance Problem Scale (GAIN-SPS). * Having been released from incarceration in the past 4 years. This is due to research that shows that people are more likely to be re-incarcerated within the first 4 years of release from incarceration. Exclusion Criteria: * Severe psychiatric disorders in the prior 6 months not stabilized (schizophrenia, depression with psychotic features, bipolar disorder, any psychosis), as measured by the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview 6 psychoticism and suicidality modules * Gross cognitive impairment as measured by the Mini Mental State Exam. * Sexual identification as female

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percentage of Days of Alcohol or Substance Misuse in the Past 30 Days

The primary outcome was the percentage of ASM (i.e., the percentage of days each substance was used in the past month) as operationalized by the Global Assessment of Individual needs. At each time point (baseline, five follow-ups), percentage ASM was calculated by dividing the reported number of days in the past month that participants used cannabis, heroin, alcohol, opioids, or cocaine by the number of days in the month (data were collected with the Timeline Follow-Back measure), multiplied by 100. Next, mean ASM frequency per month during 5 months of follow-up was calculated by adding the percentages for each substance and dividing by 5.31 We conducted correlations for self-reported ASM in the past 30 days with toxicology urine screens to assess validity of self-reported data.

Time frame: 5 months

Secondary Outcomes

Number of People Abstinent From Alcohol and Drug Use

Number of people abstinent from alcohol and drug use, which is assessed via the timeline follow back scale