The purpose of this investigation is to compare the clinical benefits of using the Pelvital product, in comparison to a sham procedure as a noninvasive treatment for female incontinence
120 subjects with SUI will be recruited into a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover trial. Subjects will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio (60 per arm) to either the control arm (PFMT) or the treatment arm (PFMT in conjunction with the Pelvital therapy). Subjects will conduct their respective therapy five minutes a day over the course of six weeks. At weeks two, four and six, the subjects will conduct bi-weekly check-ups. After six weeks, all patients in the control arm will have the option to cross over into the treatment arm if no improvement in symptoms has been shown.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
120
Pelvital probe
Placebo Probe
University of Minnesota Medical Center
Maple Grove, Minnesota, United States
Metro OBGYN
Maplewood, Minnesota, United States
University of Minnesota Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Improvement in severity of involuntary urine loss
Measured by pad testing
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
incontinence episode frequency
Daily Diary
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
health-related quality of life
Quality of Life questionarie
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.