This randomized phase III trial studies how well pembrolizumab works in treating patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) of patients with triple-negative (TNBC) or low estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and/or HER2 borderline breast cancer who have \>= 1 cm residual invasive breast cancer and/or positive lymph nodes (ypN1mi, ypN1, ypN2, ypN3) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy randomized to receive 1 year of MK-3475 (pembrolizumab) adjuvant therapy compared to no MK-3475 (pembrolizumab), in both the entire study population and also in the PD-L1 positive subset. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the effects of MK-3475 (pembrolizumab) on overall survival (OS) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) between the two randomized arms for the PD-L1 positive patients and then all patients. II. To assess the toxicity and tolerability of MK-3475 (pembrolizumab) in this patient population with or without radiation therapy. BEHAVIORAL AND HEALTH OUTCOMES (BAHO) STUDY OBJECTIVES: I. To examine the association between biomarkers of inflammation and quality of life and patient reported outcomes between the two groups during and at the end of therapy. II. To examine the long-term and late effects of treatment on patient-reported outcomes. ADDITIONAL OBJECTIVE: I. To collect tissue and whole blood for processing and banking in anticipation of future correlative studies in this patient population. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I (OBSERVATION): Patients receive no treatment but are monitored at standard clinical intervals during first year after randomization. Patients are examined every 12 weeks for 1 year, and every 6 months for 4 years, then annually for 5 years. ARM II (PEMBROLIZUMAB): Patients receive pembrolizumab intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes on days 1 and 22. Cycles repeat every 42 days for 52 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients may undergo radiation therapy within 12 weeks of last breast cancer operation or after treatment. Patients may also undergo collection of blood samples throughout the trial. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 6 months for 5 years, then annually thereafter until 10 years from treatment randomization.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,155
Undergo collection of blood samples
Correlative studies
Undergo standard monitoring
Given IV
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Undergo radiation therapy
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Southern Cancer Center PC-Daphne
Daphne, Alabama, United States
Southern Cancer Center PC-Mobile
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Southern Cancer Center PC-Providence
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Southern Cancer Center PC-Springhill
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS)
The distributions of IDFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated using Greenwood's formula. Comparisons between the two treatment arms will be performed using the stratified log-rank test. The hazard ratios and 95% CIs will be based on the stratified Cox proportional hazard model with treatment as the only covariate. Secondary analyses of IDFS will be performed to describe consistency or divergence across subgroups. This will include a forest plot of treatment hazard ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals for each level of the stratification factors and major prognostic covariates (such as use of radiation therapy). The statistical significance of the interaction between treatment and each stratification factor or prognostic variable will be assessed.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of first invasive recurrence, second invasive primary cancer (breast or not), or death due to any cause, assessed up to 10 years
Severity of fatigue
Measured by Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue scale. Will be compared between the two treatment groups by means of multiple linear regression with adjustment for the corresponding baseline measurement as well as whether or not the patient received radiation therapy which is known to be associated with post-treatment fatigue. No multiple comparisons adjustment will be employed since these outcomes evaluate the toxicity of the investigational drug. The clinical meaningfulness of each comparison will be considered.
Time frame: 55 weeks after randomization
Physical function
Reported by patients measured by PROMIS Global physical health scale. Will be compared between the two treatment groups by means of multiple linear regression with adjustment for the corresponding baseline measurement as well as whether or not the patient received radiation therapy which is known to be associated with post-treatment fatigue. No multiple comparisons adjustment will be employed since these outcomes evaluate the toxicity of the investigational drug. The clinical meaningfulness of each comparison will be considered.
Time frame: 55 weeks after randomization
Overall survival (OS)
The distributions of OS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with 95% CI calculated using Greenwood's formula. Comparisons between the two treatment arms will be performed using the stratified log-rank test. The hazard ratios and 95% CIs will be based on the stratified Cox proportional hazard model with treatment as the only covariate.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 10 years
Distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS)
The distributions of DRFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with 95% CI calculated using Greenwood's formula. Comparisons between the two treatment arms will be performed using the stratified log-rank test. The hazard ratios and 95% CIs will be based on the stratified Cox proportional hazard model with treatment as the only covariate.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of invasive distant disease recurrence, second invasive primary cancer (breast or not) or death due to any cause, assessed up to 10 years
Incidence of adverse events
Assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Toxicity analysis will be conducted in all patients receiving at least one dose of MK-3475 (pembrolizumab). The incidence of adverse events will be reported.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Severity and frequency of treatment-related symptoms (diarrhea, nausea, rash, cough, and shortness of breath, musculoskeletal pain) over time of patients receiving pembrolizumab
Compared without treatment. The distributions of the corresponding Patient Reported Outcomes version of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) items will be compared between the two treatment groups using a mixed ordinal logistic regression model for repeated measures. The model will also include the corresponding baseline measurement and time. Presence of treatment-by-time interaction will be tested for each of these endpoints. Similar analyses will be performed for disease related symptoms. The descriptive and graphical methods suggested in Basch, et. al. will be used to summarize the distributions of different symptoms by treatment group over time.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Alaska Oncology and Hematology LLC
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Anchorage Oncology Centre
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Katmai Oncology Group
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Providence Alaska Medical Center
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
...and 910 more locations
Emotional function and disease-related symptoms in patients receiving pembrolizumab
Assessed by PROMIS global mental health scale score. Will be compared between the two treatment groups using a mixed model for repeated measures analysis with adjustment for the baseline score and time. Presence of treatment-by-time interaction will be investigated.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Impact of treatment and treatment-related symptoms on physical function in patients without therapy
Compared to patients receiving pembrolizumab. A multiple linear regression model will be performed with physical health scale score as an outcome and treatment and treatment related symptoms as covariates. Presence of treatment by each individual symptom item interactions will be investigated.
Time frame: 55 weeks after randomization
Relationship between treatment-related symptoms and adherence to the study medication
Will be investigated among patients randomized to pembrolizumab treatment group by means of multiple logistic regression. Patients who have been on study therapy for 70% or more of their expected time on therapy will be considered adherent.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Resolution of treatment-related symptoms in patients receiving pembrolizumab
Compared to patients without treatment. A change in severity of the particular symptom will be compared between the two treatment groups by means of multiple linear regression with adjustment for the corresponding measurement at the 55 week assessment point.
Time frame: 18 months after randomization
Long-term quality of life and symptoms between the two treatment groups
Mixed models for repeated measures analysis will be used with adjustment for scores at 18 months to examine changes in physical and emotional domain scores, fatigue and other persistent symptoms over the course
Time frame: Up to 60 months after randomization
Role of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the development of pembrolizumab associated symptoms
Specifically focused on treatment-associated fatigue. This will be compared to patients in the observation group.
Time frame: Up to 55 weeks
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the promotor region of pro-inflammatory cytokine genes and the risk for development and severity of treatment-associated fatigue and other symptoms
The role of these SNPs in the persistence of long-term fatigue in all patients will also be explored using treatment assignment as a covariate.
Time frame: Up to 10 years