A precise volume status assessment is critical to improve outcome of patients on dialysis. Yet, accurate assessment of fluid status remains a challenge. Currently, this is performed by clinical evaluation and regular weight measurements before and after dialysis, which is not always accurate. Moreover, bioimpedance technology is used in some centers for quantitative assessment of total body water. This approach has been validated for the assessment of volume status in dialysis patients, but requires the acquisition of specific tools and is time consuming. So far, no biomarker has been validated to quantify volume status in dialysis patients. Application of biomarkers might contribute to a better dialysis prescription and therefore to outcome improvement in dialysis. The investigators aim to investigate the role of a novel biomarkers (sCD146) to assess volume status in dialysis patients
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
45
Measuring volume status with bioelectrical impedance measurement and comparing with biomarker level
University Hospital Zürich
Zurich, Switzerland
Correlation of sCD146 level with overhydration assessed by bioimpedance technology
For hemodialysis patients measurements will be concluded within 3 weeks, for peritoneal dialysis patients measures will be concluded within 3 months
Time frame: 3 weeks to 3 months
Correlation of sCD146 level measured after dialysis and ultrafiltration rate
for hemodialysis patients measurements will be concluded within 3 weeks
Time frame: 3 weeks
Correlation of sCD146 level and clinical evaluation of volume status
For hemodialysis patients measurements will be concluded within 3 weeks, for peritoneal dialysis patients measures will be concluded within 3 months
Time frame: 3 weeks to 3 months
Correlation of sCD146 level and level of NT-proBNP
For hemodialysis patients measurements will be concluded within 3 weeks, for peritoneal dialysis patients measures will be concluded within 3 months
Time frame: 3 weeks to 3 months
Correlation of sCD146 level and mortality as assessed prospectively in 6 months follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
Correlation of sCD146 level and hospitalizations as assessed prospectively in 6 months follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
Correlation of sCD146 level and cardiovascular complications as assessed prospectively in 6 months follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
Correlation of sCD146 level and shunt complications as assessed prospectively in 6 months follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.