This study is designed to note whether a larger safety study using quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) versus quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4)(FLUARIX®), would be feasible in children with persistent asthma. Half of the patients in this study will receive the FLUARIX® influenza vaccine, while the other half will receive a cell cultured quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (ccIIV4)(Flucelvax®) being used as a surrogate for LAIV4.
The association of an increased risk in wheezing following receipt of a live-attenuated influenza vaccine in children at least 2 years of age with a prior history of asthma or wheeze remains unclear. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention's Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) planned to address a data safety gap regarding use of LAIV4 vaccine in children with asthma by conducting a 3-site randomized, non-inferiority prospective study. The main goal was to compare the safety of LAIV4 versus IIV4 in children 5-11 years with persistent asthma during the 2016-2017 influenza season. CDC and the CISA study sites developed a protocol and associated materials, and were poised to begin enrollment early during the 2016-2017 influenza season. However, after the June 22, 2016 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) vote recommending against use of LAIV4 during the 2016-2017 influenza season, CDC and study investigators decided to defer implementing a study using LAIV4 during the 2016-2017 influenza season. Investigators will reconsider initiating this study during the 2017-2018 influenza season if ACIP votes to reinstate LAIV4 use or new data become available; ACIP makes recommendations annually. The planned LAIV4 study had unique features in its design that previously had not been implemented in vaccine safety studies, including: 1) enrolling a substantial proportion of children with moderate-severe asthma 2) using digital peak flow meters and 3) collecting clinical data through multiple, complementary, measures for 42 days after vaccination. To capitalize on progress made during development of the study protocol and associated documents and procedures, CISA is proposing to carry out a study at the three sites to assess the feasibility of recruiting, enrolling, retaining, and collecting clinical data on children 5-11 years with persistent asthma of varied levels of severity in an influenza vaccine safety study. Findings from this proposed feasibility study will facilitate improving the LAIV4 study in the future if it goes forward through the CISA Project or in another venue. In 2016-2017 season, FDA approved a new influenza vaccine for use in persons aged 4 years and older, Flucelvax® Quadrivalent (ccIIV4); ACIP incorporated this vaccine into its recommendations for the 2016-2017 influenza season. Therefore ccIIV4 will be used in place of LAIV4 for this feasibility study. There is no evidence that Flucelvax® increases the risk of wheezing in asthmatic children. The feasibility study also offers an opportunity to gain some additional descriptive safety data for this new vaccine in asthmatic children.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
40
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Duke Clinical Vaccine Unit
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Complete the Memory Aid 1.
Memory aid 1 is a diary completed by the subjects Parent. Daily symptoms, peak flow and requires the parent to record daily symptoms, peak flow, days, post-vaccination asthma clinical symptoms and symptom scores, adverse event, fever and concomitant medication administration data for 14 days (until day 15) after vaccination.
Time frame: 15 days
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parent Completing Collection of Adverse Event Data
Parent will collect the following data: need for new prescription or nonprescription medications for the control of asthma, an unscheduled healthcare provider visit or consultation within 42 days after vaccination, any other clinically significant event occurring at any point during the study period. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) will also be monitored through 42 days after vaccination and will include events that result in death, were life threatening, result in subject hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, result in persistent or significant disability or incapacity. Additionally, important medical events that may not have resulted in death, were not life threatening, or did not require hospitalization might be considered SAEs when, according to appropriate medical judgment, they jeopardize the patient or subject and require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time frame: Day 16 to 43
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Perform and Document All Home Digital Peak Flow Measurements
Number of parents that perform and document all home digital peak flow measurements at least 11 days out of the 15-day monitoring period.
Time frame: 15 days
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Perform and Document the Digital Peak Flow for Day 42
Parent will perform and document the digital peak flow for Day 42
Time frame: Day 42
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Document Nighttime Awakenings
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Number of parents that document nighttime awakenings for at least 11 of the 15-day monitoring period.
Time frame: 15 days
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 4 Call and Provide Requested Data
Number of parents that respond to Day 4 ( -1 day or + 2 days) call and provide requested data
Time frame: Day 3 to 6
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 8 Call and Provide Requested Data.
Number of parents that respond to Day 8 (plus 2 days) call and provide requested data.
Time frame: Day 8-10
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 15 Call and Provide Requested Data
Number of parents that respond to Day 15 (minus 1 or plus 2 days) call and provide requested data
Time frame: Day 14 to 17
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 29 Call and Provide Requested Data.
Number of Parents that respond to Day 29 ( Plus 2 Days) call and provide requested data.
Time frame: Day 29-31
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 44 Call
Number of parents that respond to Day 44 ( Plus 3 Days) call and provide requested data.
Time frame: Day 44-47
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents Completing a Satisfaction Survey
Parent of each participant will be asked to complete a at the end of the study
Time frame: 42 days
Severe Local Reactogenicity Events During the 14 Days Post-vaccination
Number of severe local reactogenicity events for 14 days after vaccination between recipients of ccIIV4 and IIV4.
Time frame: 14 days
Severe Systemic Reactogenicity Events During the 14 Days Post-vaccination
Number of solicited severe (not serious) systemic reactogenicity events for 14 days after vaccination between recipients of ccIIV4 and IIV4.
Time frame: 14 days
Unsolicited and Severe Adverse Events
The nature and frequency of the unsolicited and Severe adverse events will be described in children receiving ccIIV4 and IIV4 during the 42 days after vaccination.
Time frame: 42 days
Number of Asthma Exacerbations Requiring Steroids
For the purpose of this study, asthma exacerbation will be defined as: any acute episode of progressively worsening shortness of breath/dyspnea, cough, wheezing, chest tightness, and/or respiratory distress during the 42 days post-vaccination (until day 43) for which the patient receives a new prescription for systemic corticosteroids..
Time frame: 42 days
Number Participants With Asthma Exacerbations Requiring Medical Attention
For the purpose of this study, asthma exacerbation will be defined as: any acute episode of progressively worsening shortness of breath/dyspnea, cough, wheezing, chest tightness, and/or respiratory distress during the 42 days post-vaccination (until day 43) for which the patient seeks unscheduled medical attention (e.g., healthcare provider office or Emergency Department visit or hospitalization)
Time frame: 42 days