This study is intended to show that ExAblate™ MRgFUS is a safe procedure that can significantly postpone or eliminate the need of patients with organ confined intermediate risk prostate cancer to undergo a definitive treatment (i.e., Radical Prostatectomy or Radiation therapy) for their disease.
This study will evaluate the proportion of patients with organ-confined intermediate risk prostate cancer (OC-IRPC) undergoing focal ExAblate™ MRgFUS prostate treatment that will be free of clinically significant PCa which requires definitive treatment at 2 years after completion of their ExAblate™ treatment and to demonstrate the safety of focal ExAblate™ MRgFUS treatment. Clinically significant PCa requiring definitive treatment is defined as pathology findings from whole-gland, imaging-guided, extended mapping biopsy of Gleason Score (GS) \> 7 The primary efficacy endpoint in this trial, measured at 24 months with whole-gland extended imaging-guided mapping biopsy, is Response scored dichotomously for each subject as follows: * Response = 0 ("Failure"): Positive mapping biopsy defined as Gleason Score \> 7 (indicating definitive treatment) in any part of their prostate gland * Response = 1 ("Success"): Negative mapping biopsy defined as Gleason Score \< 7. Safety of ExAblate™ treatment will be determined by evaluation of the incidence and severity of device related complications from the first treatment day visit throughout entire follow-up duration. All adverse events will be captured and recorded. However, the safety of the ExAblate™ treatment will be defined by the incidence and severity of treatment or device related adverse events, grades III - V (CTCAE version 4.03; 2010-06-14). Secondary Effectiveness Outcomes: 1. % of patients with negative 5-month follow-up biopsy results in the treated part of the prostate 2. Treatment effect on patients' Quality of Life (QoL), the following validated self-reported urogenital functioning assessment instruments will be used before and following treatment at pre-specified intervals. 1. Urinary symptoms - IPSS 2. Urinary continence - ICIQ-UI-SF 3. Sexual function - IIEF-15 3. PSA levels and post-treatment PSA kinetics will also be assessed
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
53
ExAblate treatment of prostate cancer less than or equal to Grade 7
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Beijing Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Changhai Hospital of Shanghai
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
St. Mary's Hospital
London, United Kingdom
The primary efficacy endpoint in this trial measured with whole-gland extended imaging-guided mapping biopsy, is Response scored dichotomously; success vs. failure
Response will be based on mapping biopsy defined by Gleason 7 Score in any part of the prostate gland
Time frame: 24 months post treatment
Adverse events
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time frame: 24 months post treatment
Percent of patients with negative biopsy
% of patients with negative 5-month follow-up biopsy results in the treated part of the prostate
Time frame: 5 months post treatment
Quality of Life - urinary symptoms - IPSS questionnaire score
Treatment effect on patients' Quality of Life (QoL), i.e., urinary symptoms
Time frame: 24 months post treatment
Quality of Life - urinary continence - ICIQ-SF questionnaire score
Treatment effect on patients' Quality of Life, (QoL), i.e., urinary continence
Time frame: 24 months post treatment
Quality of Life - sexual function - IIEF-15 questionnaire score
Treatment effect on patients' Quality of Life, (QoL), i.e.,sexual function
Time frame: 24 months
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
PSA levels and post-treatment PSA kinetics will be assessed
Time frame: 24 months post treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.