Aim of this study is to investigate efficacy and safety of Echinaforce Junior Tablets (250mg) in comparison with Vitamin C tablets in the prevention of acute viral respiratory tract infections.
200 children aged 4-12 years are recruited by pediatricians and general practitioners and are allocated to preventive treatment with either Echinaforce Junior tablets or Vitamin C. Children take 3 x 1 tablet per day over a period of 2 months followed by 1 week treatment break and an intermediate study visit (V2). Thereafter children continue with preventive Treatment for another 2 months, followed by exclusion visit (V3). Parents are required to contact a study coordinator at the occurrence of acute respiratory Symptoms to initiate symptom recording via internet-based e-diary. On day 1 - 3 of episode parents will sample nasal secretion, which will be analysed for common respiratory agents.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
203
Dr. med. Mercedes Ogal
Brunnen, Switzerland
cumulative number of cold days
total number of days with cold symptoms as per diary entries
Time frame: 4 months prevention
Occurrence of adverse events
Occurrence of adverse events will be analysed by descriptive methods
Time frame: 4 months prevention
Analysis of duration and severity of respiratory episodes (single Symptoms and total symptom score)
Patients will rate respiratory symptoms in a diary at occurrence of acute respiratory tract infections and the entries will be analysed descriptively for the two treatment groups
Time frame: 4 months prevention
Incidence of respiratory tract infections (viral RTIs)
Occurrence of colds and flu episodes
Time frame: 4 months prevention
Acceptance in the view of the parents
Parents will judge the acceptance after 4 months (would you use the medicament again?)
Time frame: 4 months prevention
Occurrence of adverse drug reactions
Occurrence of adverse drug reactions will be analysed by descriptive methods
Time frame: 4 months prevention
Tolerability in view of the physician
physicians will judge tolerability as "bad", "moderate", "good" or "very good"
Time frame: 4 months prevention
Tolerability in view of the parents
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
parents will judge the tolerability after 2 and 4 months treatment as "bad", "moderate", "good" or "very good"
Time frame: After 4 months prevention
Efficacy in the view of the parents/children
Parents/children will give their subjective impression of efficacy by ratings "bad", "moderate", "good" or " very good".
Time frame: 4 months prevention
accompanying virus analytics
nasal samples will be taken at occurrence of cold Symptoms and will be analysed for the presence of respiratory viruses
Time frame: 4 months prevention
effects on the endogenous defense
Question will be asked " do you think that the prevention had the follwing effects on the endogenous defense in your child?" (unchanged; improved; significantly improved")
Time frame: 4 months prevention
Concomitant treatment and therapies
Concomitant treatment and therapies will be coded using medical dictionary for Regulatory Agencies and will be analysed descriptively for the two treatment groups
Time frame: 4 months prevention