Multicenter feasibility study of the HighLife™ TMVR system.
This is an exploratory clinical study designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety and performance of the Highlife TMVR System in a population of patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation, who are not suitable for surgical or approved percutaneous treatments according to the judgement of the Heart Team. The data gathered in this study will allow to evaluate the feasibility of mitral replacement using the HighLife™ TMVR system and characterize the safety and performance profile of the HighLife™ TMVR System. All patients will be followed periodically up to 12 months after the intervention and long term safety and performance will be collected annually up to 5 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
5
Minimally invasive transcatheter mitral valve implantation using the HighLife™ TMVR system
CHRU Lille
Lille, France
Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier
Massy, France
CHU Nantes
Nantes, France
Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpétrière Institut de Cardiologie
Paris, France
Freedom of major adverse events
including: * All-cause mortality * Myocardial infarction or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG * Major stroke * Life-threatening bleeding (MVARC scale) * Major access and vascular complications * Stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury (includes dialysis) * Any valve-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication requiring surgery or repeat intervention * Severe hypotension, heart failure or respiratory failure requiring intravenous pressors or invasive or mechanical heart failure treatments such as ultrafiltration or hemodynamic assist devices, including intra-aortic balloon pumps or left ventricular or biventricular assist devices, or prolonged intubation for ≥ 48H
Time frame: at 30 days post procedure
Continued intended performance of the HighLife™ bioprosthesis
defined as the reduction of mitral regurgitation (MR) to either optimal (0+ to trace) or acceptable (reduced by at least 1 grade from baseline with no more than 2+ MR) without significant mitral stenosis (post-procedure EOA ≥ 1.5 cm2 with a transmitral gradient \< 5mmHg) and with no greater than mild (1+) paravalvular MR (and without associated hemolysis)
Time frame: at 30 days post procedure
Technical success
defined as alive patient at exit from procedure room, with all of the following: * Successful access, delivery and retrieval of the HighLife delivery systems * Deployment and correct positioning of the HighLife bioprosthesis * Freedom of additional emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the device or access procedure
Time frame: immediately after procedure
Device Success (per MVARC definitions)
per MVARC definition
Time frame: At 30 days, 6 months and 12 months post procedure
Procedure Success
per MVARC definition
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
CHU Rennes Pontchaillou
Rennes, France
CHU Toulouse Rangueil
Toulouse, France
Universitätsklinikum
Bonn, Germany
Universitäres Herzzentrum Hamburg GmbH (UHZ)
Hamburg, Germany
Herzzentrum Leipzig
Leipzig, Germany
Deutsches Herzzentrum München des Freistaates Bayern
Munich, Germany
Time frame: At 30 days, 6 months and 12 months post procedure
Patient Success
per MVARC definition
Time frame: At 30 days, 6 months and 12 months post procedure
Hemodynamic Performance vs. Baseline
Echocardiographic evaluation
Time frame: At 7 days, 30 days, at 6 months and 12 months and at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years
Functional Improvement vs. Baseline
New York Heart Association Class 6-Minute Walk Test
Time frame: At 30 days, 6 months and 12 months
Quality of Life Improvement vs. Baseline
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
Time frame: At 6 months and 12 months