To investigate the efficacy and safety of Leflunomide (LEF) versus placebo combined with prednisone for active Takayasu arteritis (TAK) in Chinese population.
Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a rare form of large-vessel vasculitis, characterized by immune -induced vascular inflammation, resulting in the stenosis and occlusion of blood vessels \[1\]. TAK is observed predominantly in Asian females under 40 years of age \[2, 3\]. The stenosis or occlusion of blood vessels can cause severe ischemic events (e.g., acute myocardial infarction, stroke, death) involving multiple organs. Patients with TAK experience impaired quality of life \[4\] and face a significantly higher risk of death compared with that in the sex- and age-matched general population, with a standardized mortality ranging from 2.7 to 17.3 \[5, 6, 7\]. Thus, timely and efficacious treatment is important to improve the prognosis in such a young population. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the first-line therapy for active TAK \[8, 9\]. High-dose GCs are initially efficacious. However, disease recurrence can occur in approximately 60% patients during the GCs tapering \[10, 11\]. Prolonged use of GCs is associated with significant toxicity, including glucose-metabolism disorders, cardiovascular adverse events (AEs), and osteoporosis \[12, 13\]. Therefore, immunosuppressive therapy is required to minimize the dose and duration of GC exposure \[8, 9\]. Conventional immunosuppressants have been recommended as GC-tapering agents for active TAK, whereas biological agents are recommended in refractory cases \[8, 9\]. Most previous studies focused on TAK treatment have been observational, only five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are found, among which, just one study reported the effect of conventional immunosuppressants mycophenolate \[14, 15, 16, 17, 18\]. Thus, high-quality evidence to support therapeutic options of conventional immunosuppressants is very limited. Leflunomide (LEF) is a conventional immunosuppressant \[19\], which has shown satisfied GC-tapering effects in the treatment of giant cell arteritis, another large vessel vasculitis, in several observational studies \[20, 21, 22\]. In 2012, the first open-label study of 14 TAK patients demonstrated that 70% of patients could achieve at least partial clinical remission, and the GC dose could be reduced by 50% during LEF treatment \[23\]. Since then, several observational cohort or case-control studies have reported the efficacy of LEF for active TAK \[24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29\]. A most recent study reported a comparable complete response rate of LEF (78%) versus adalimumab (88%) at 15-month follow-up \[30\]. Thus, LEF would be a promising alternative treatment for TAK, but evidence from RCTs is lacking. We conducted this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of LEF versus placebo combined with prednisone for active TAK, namely "Takayasu arteritis clinical trial in China" (TACTIC; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02981979).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
116
Leflunomide: For LEF arm, 20mg per day, p.o. through the whole study. For placebo group, 20mg per day, p.o. from week 25 to week 52.
Prednisone (5mg/tab): basic therapy, start with 0.6mg/kg/d and maintained for 4 weeks, then reducing 5mg every 2 weeks until 10mg per day.
2 tabs/d used in placebo arm for the first 24 weeks.
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
The first affiliated hospital of Nanchang University
Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
The First Hospital of China Medical University
Shenyang, Liaoning, China
Zhongshan hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Achievement of clinical remission at week 24
Clinical remission is defined as follows: (i) have no systemic symptoms (e.g., fever, fatigue, weight loss); (ii) have no new onset of ischemic symptoms and signs; (iii) have a normal level of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). If not achieved, the investigator excluded other influencing factors (especially infection), re-measure the ESR after 1 week, and use the re-examined value in the analyses. Subject achieving clinical remission should meet all these criteria above. The clinical remission rate and its difference between LEF and placebo group with 95% confidence interval (CI) at week 24 was estimated by Newcombe-Wilson procedure. If the lower limit of the 95%CI of the difference \>10%, it is considered that the efficacy of LEF is significantly superior to placebo.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the end of induced remission therapy, assessed up to 24 weeks
Time to clinical remission
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of first documented clinical remission, assessed up to 24 weeks
The mean prednisone dose at week 24
Time frame: At the end of induced remission therapy, assessed up to 24 weeks
Achievement of clinical remission at week 52 in those who switched from placebo to LEF from week 25
Time frame: From the time of switch from placebo to LEF treatment (week 25), assessed up to week 52
Disease recurrence through week 25 to week 52
Disease recurrence is defined as NIH score ≥2 or not meeting ≥2 criteria for clinical remission. NIH score: 1\) presence of systemic symptoms as fever, fatigue and weight loss (1'); 2)presence of ischemic symptoms or signs (1'); 3\) abnormal serum ESR levels (1'); 4\) progression or new site of vascular lesions on MRA or CTA compared to baseline(1').
Time frame: From the beginning of week 25 to the end of follow up, assessed up to week 52
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, China
Time to recurrence
Time frame: from the beginning of achieving clinical remission to the date of the first documented disease recurrence, assessed up to 52 weeks
Imaging changes at the end of week 24 and week 52 compared to the baseline
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the end of week 24 and week 52
Safety-adverse events
For safety analysis, the incidence and severity of AEs, adverse drug reactions and laboratory values in the LEF and placebo group would be estimated and compared using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. The association of an abnormal laboratory index and adverse event with the investigational drug would be evaluated.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the end of this trial, assessed up to 52 weeks