In the present study, 144 children (72 males and 72 females), whose ages ranged between 8-13, were divided into 12 equal experimental groups according to their ages and gender. They were all considered to have poor hygiene. Only one out of the three different education methods (brochure, model or video) was applied to each group. The percentage change in PI, GI, BOP and theoretical test points from the baseline to the 6th months were evaluated.
Aim: The aim the present study was to evaluate the impact of three different education methods on the oral hygiene levels of school children using clinical and theoretical findings. Methods: In the present study, 144 children (72 males and 72 females), whose ages ranged between 8-13, were divided into 12 equal experimental groups according to their ages and gender. They were all considered to have poor hygiene. Only one out of the three different education methods (brochure, model or video) was applied to each group. The percentage change in PI, GI, BOP and theoretical test points from the baseline to the 6th months were evaluated. The data was statistically analysed by using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and One-way ANOVA tests.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
144
Scaling and oral hygiene instructions with brochure, model or video
Theoretical Test Application
The changes in theoretical test scores after education
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment
Gingival index
The changes in gingival index after education
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment
Plaque index
The changes in plaque index after education
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment
Bleeding on probing
The changes in bleeding on probing after education
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.