Women in the menopause transition ('perimenopause') are exposed to extreme hormone variability, tend to experience a unique set of severe stressors (e.g., divorce, death of loved ones), and are also at substantially elevated risk to suffer from mood and anxiety disorders. The purpose of this research is to understand the mechanisms by which variability in estradiol (E2) is associated with the symptoms of anxiety and anhedonia (loss of interest and pleasure - a common symptom of depression). By stabilizing E2 variability with a hormonal manipulation, this research will determine the degree to which the E2 variability (or E2 levels) plays a causal role in perimenopausal anxiety and anhedonia symptoms and whether it does so by affecting biological responses to stress.
Framed within a diathesis-stress model, the primary objective of this research is to determine the pathophysiological mechanisms of estradiol (E2) in the clinical anxiety and anhedonia seen in the menopause transition (MT). Specifically whether E2 variability or E2 levels predict exaggerated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis reactivity and impaired recovery to stress and, in turn, deficits in behavioral indices of threat responsivity and approach motivation and symptoms of anxiety and anhedonia. The secondary objective of the research is to use a hormonal manipulation as a mechanistic probe to stabilize E2 variability in premenopausal ranges and determine if: a) HPA axis reactivity/recovery represents a biomarker of behavioral and symptom responses to E2 stabilization; b) whether recent severe life stress predicts the HPA axis response to hormone stabilization. A total of 170 women in the early or late MT who are eligible for the hormonal probe will be recruited to reflect the full continuum of anxiety and anhedonia symptoms based on self-report to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale, respectively. However, the investigators will over-represent the clinically impairing end of the anxious and anhedonic phenotype (75% of the sample). Over an 8-week baseline, anxiety and anhedonia symptoms and serum E2 measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) will be assessed on a weekly basis. At baseline week 8, HPA axis (plasma cortisol and ACTH) response to the Trier Social Stress Test and behavioral measures of threat responsivity (via Dot-Probe task) and approach motivation (Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task 'EEfRT') will be determined. Using transdermal E2 as a pharmacological probe to stabilize variability of E2 in premenopausal ranges, women will then be randomized to transdermal E2 (0.10 mg) or placebo for 16 weeks. This is not a clinical efficacy trial. The investigators will use an randomized control trial (RCT) design with a hormonal manipulation in order to investigate the pathophysiologic role of E2 variability (or E2 levels) in HPA axis dysregulation and, in turn, threat responsivity and approach motivation. Serum E2 will be assessed weekly during weeks 9-16, and HPA axis reactivity to stress and behavioral responses to the Dot-Probe and EEfRT tasks will be assessed every four weeks during the 16 week probe.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
82
Transdermal Estradiol worn daily for 16 weeks (patch changed every 7 days).
Matching placebo patches to be worn every day for 16 weeks (patch changed every 7 days).
Micronized progesterone (200 mg) will be administered every day for 12 days during the 9th week of randomization and again following randomization at the 17th week
Matching placebo capsules will be administered orally every day for 12 days during the 9th week of randomization and again following randomization at the 17th week.
UNC SHARRP Lab
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Susan Girdler, PhD, Principal Investigator
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Change Over Time in the Anxiety Score From State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
The State-Trait anxiety inventory is consists of 20 questions on a 4-point force-choice Likert-type response scales (scores 0 - 3). The 20 questions are summed together for final score. The score can range from 0 to 60 with higher scores representing higher levels of anxiety. Change over time is defined as the difference in the least square means between timepoints and 95% confidence interval limits.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 8), Weeks 16, 20 and 24
Change Over Time in Anhedonia Score From Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Anhedonia will be assessed using SHAPS scores which range from 14-56, with higher scores corresponding to higher levels of anhedonia. Change over time is defined as the difference in least square means between time points and 95% confidence interval limits.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 8), Weeks 16, 20 and 24
Change Over Time in AUC Cortisol Stress Response
The stress biomarker cortisol (µg/dL) assessed at rest and in response to the Trier Social Stress test (AUC with respect to ground) at baseline (Week 8) and again post-randomization at weeks 16, 20 and 24. Blood serum samples for measuring cortisol are taken at immediately before the Trier Social Stress test and at 10, 20, 30, and 45 minutes post test. Change over time is defined as the difference in least square means between timepoints and with 95% confidence interval limits.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 8), Weeks 16, 20 and 24
Change Over Time in Threat Bias Score From Dot Probe Task
Changes in threat bias scores assessed using Dot Probe task during labs at weeks 8, 16, 20 and 24. The bias measurement protocol consists of 144 trials (48 threat congruent, 48 threat incongruent, 48 neutral presentations). Participants indicate the probe letter via button press. Angry face location, probe location, probe type and actor are all fully counterbalanced in presentation. The threat bias score equals the mean of reaction time on threat congruent from threat incongruent trials. A threat bias scores \>0 indicate a bias towards threat, whereas scores \<0 mean that the participant is slower to respond to threatening stimuli than neutral stimuli. Reaction times were measured in milliseconds. Change over time is defined as the difference in least square means between timepoints with 95% confidence interval limits.
Time frame: up to 24 weeks
Change Over Time in Percent of "Hard Task" Choice in EEfRT
Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) measures approach motivation that indexes the willingness to expend effort to obtain monetary rewards under varying conditions of reward probability and magnitude. On each trial, participants choose between an "easy task" and a "hard task" and are presented with information about the probability of winning (i.e., 12%, 50%, or 88%), and the magnitude of the potential reward if they complete the button-press task successfully (range: $1.24 - $4.12). Completion of the easy task requires 30 button presses in 7 seconds using the dominant index finger, whereas completion of the hard task requires 100 presses with the non-dominant "pinky" finger in 21 seconds. The percent of hard task choices is the dependent measure. Change over time is defined as the difference in least square means between time points with 95% confidence interval limits.
Time frame: up to 24 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.