The purpose of this study is to determine wether D3 lymph node dissection gives superior oncological outcomes compared to standard D2 lymph node dissection in colon cancer
The design involves random allocation of eligible patients to D3 or D2 lymph node dissection group in 1:1 ratio. The extent of colonic resection itself is not influenced by the randomization and is predefined by the investigator prior to randomization. Requirements applied to centers participating in the trial and surgeons performing procedures are described in the protocol and refer to center volume and surgeon's experience with evaluation of non-edited video-recordings of procedures. Routine quality control includes requirement to photograph vessels with the clip to determine the extent of lymph node dissection performed and a thorough morphological assessment of the specimen. After surgery patients are treated according to local standards with no difference wether D2 or D3 lymph node dissection was performed. Short-term and long-term outcomes are registered as per protocol. This is a superiority trial evaluating statistical superiority. With the 50% five year survival according to national registry for colon cancer, expecting 10% improvement in survival with D3 lymph node dissection, enrollment of 768 patients during 3 year accrual period followed by 5 year follow up is required for a power of 80%. The intent-to-treat principle is used for the data analysis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
780
Appropriate to the tumor location colonic resection is performed with D2 lymph node dissection
Appropriate to the tumor location colonic resection is performed with D3 lymph node dissection
Krasnodar City clinical hospital #1
Krasnodar, Russia
State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology
Moscow, Russia
Moscow city oncological hospital #62
Moscow, Russia
Overall survival
overall survival of patients
Time frame: 5 years after last patient enrolled
Disease-free survival
Survival without local or systemic recurrence
Time frame: 5 years after last patient enrolled
Postoperative morbidity
Complications after surgery
Time frame: within the first 30 days after surgery
Postoperative mortality
Death after surgery
Time frame: within the first 30 days after surgery
Postoperative recovery parameters
Complex of parameters describing the pattern of recovery after surgery (i.e. food tolerance, peristalsis, walking etc.)
Time frame: within the first 30 days after surgery
Pattern of lymph node metastasis based on pathology report
Number of lymph node with metastases related to number of lymph nodes studied in each group in the specimen
Time frame: enrollment period
CME quality
Ratio of good, satisfactory and unsatisfactory quality according to pathology report
Time frame: enrollment period
Lymph node yield
Number of lymph nodes removed according to pathology report
Time frame: enrollment period
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
P. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute
Moscow, Russia
Medical radiological scientific center named after A.F. Tsyba
Obninsk, Russia
Rostov Research Institute of Oncology
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Saint Petersburg, Russia
St Petersburg City Clinical Oncology Dispensary
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Saint-Petersburg Clinical Research center of specialized kinds of medical care (Oncology)
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Scientific-Research institute of Oncology named after N.N. Petrov
Saint Petersburg, Russia
...and 2 more locations
Quality of life in patients after D2 and D3 lymph node dissection using questionnaire
CR29 and CR30 questionnaires by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer
Time frame: enrollment period