The goal of this trial is to refine and test a novel emotion-regulation based psychosocial intervention designed to reduce suicide risk in middle-aged and older adults (50-90 years old) who have been discharged after a suicide-related hospitalization (i.e. for suicidal ideation or suicide attempt).
The Investigators developed a novel psychosocial intervention called "Cognitive Reappraisal Intervention for Suicide Prevention (CRISP)," which aims to improve cognitive reappraisal ability (i.e. the ability to modify the appraisal of a situation to alter its emotional significance) (target), and reduce suicide risk (outcome). The conceptual framework views suicidal ideation and behavior as failed attempts to regulate negative emotions and by improving cognitive reappraisal, an effective emotion regulation strategy, the investigators expect to reduce suicide risk. This theory is supported by studies showing that unsuccessful attempts to regulate negative emotions and decreased cognitive reappraisal are associated with increased suicidal ideation and behavior. The R61 phase is a proof-of-principle phase and its goals are to optimize CRISP and test its engagement with cognitive reappraisal. Certified social workers will administer 12 weekly sessions of CRISP to 40 middle-aged and older adults (50-90 years old) after a suicide-related hospitalization. Research assistants, unaware of the study aims, will conduct assessments at study entry (hospital admission), discharge, 6 and 12 weeks post-discharge. Target engagement will be assessed with EEG assessments during a standard pictured-based stimuli and our novel cognitive reappraisal paradigm. The R33 phase aims to provide further evidence of target engagement of the optimized CRISP in a larger sample, evaluate the relationship of cognitive reappraisal with suicide risk as measured with Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and estimate implementation parameters for a large-scale clinical trial. A different sample of 90 middle-aged and older adults (using the same inclusion/exclusion criteria as for the R61 phase) will be randomized to CRISP or to Supportive Therapy (ST, a control treatment not designed to improve emotion regulation). Assessments will be conducted on admission, at discharge, and at 6, 12 and 24 weeks post-discharge. Primary aims are: 1) CRISP participants will show improvement in cognitive reappraisal ability from discharge to end of treatment; and 2) improvement in cognitive reappraisal ability will be associated with suicide risk over 24 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
107
Cognitive Reappraisal Intervention for Suicide Prevention, or CRISP, is a psychosocial intervention aimed to reduce suicide risk in middle-aged and older adults who have been hospitalized for suicidal ideation or suicide attempt. CRISP offers a combination of emotion regulation techniques, including changing the subject's perspective or the way he/she thinks to improve emotion reactions. Additional strategies taught include the provision of environmental adaptation tools (notes, checklists, calendars, etc), phone calls, and a tablet application called WellPATH.
ST focuses on: 1. facilitating expression of affect; 2. conveying to the patient that he or she is understood; 3. offering empathy; and 4. highlighting positive experiences. The ST manual aims to standardize nonspecific therapeutic factors
Weill Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine
White Plains, New York, United States
Change in Late Positive Potential, as Measured by the Electroencephalagram (EEG), Autobiographical Affective Regulation Task (AART), and a Standard Picture-based Emotion Regulation Task. (Only for the R33)
The reported values for each assessment represent μVoltage (a unit of electrical potential) during EEG tasks. These values are the mean result of a composite measure (50% of each task) of μVoltage during the Autobiographical Affective Regulation Task (AART) and a standard picture-based emotion regulation task. Higher values reflect stronger emotional response and lower cognitive reappraisal ability. The results are interpreted comparatively to other values (other groups or other time points) (Only for the R33).
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12
Changes in Electrocortical Measures (i.e., Late Positive Potential, LPP) (Only for the R61)
The reported values for each assessment represent μVoltage (a unit of electrical potential) during EEG tasks at Baseline and Week 12. These values are the mean result of a composite measure (50% of each task) of a) a standardized picture-based emotion regulation task in parietal (Pz) site during 1600-2000ms and b) AART in parietal (Pz) site during 0-3000 ms. Higher values reflect stronger emotional response and lower cognitive reappraisal ability. The results are interpreted comparatively to other values (other groups or other time points) (Only for the R61).
Time frame: Baseline - Week 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.