Clinical Study of Cefiderocol (S-649266) for the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia Caused by Gram-negative Pathogens

Shionogi300 enrolled

Overview

The primary objective of this study is to compare all-cause mortality at Day 14 in participants receiving cefiderocol with participants receiving the comparator, meropenem, in adults with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), or healthcare-associated bacterial pneumonia (HCABP) caused by Gram-negative pathogens.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

TRIPLE

Enrollment

300

Conditions

Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP)Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP)Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)

Interventions

CefiderocolDRUG

2000 mg intravenously every 8 hours for a period of 7 to14 days (dosage adjustment is necessary based on renal function)

MeropenemDRUG

2000 mg intravenously every 8 hours for a period of 7 to 14 days (dosage adjustment is necessary based on renal function)

LinezolidDRUG

600 mg of linezolid administered intravenously over 30 minutes to 2 hours, every 12 hours.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects 18 years or older at the time of signing informed consent * Subjects who have provided written informed consent or their informed consent has been provided by a legally authorized representative * Subjects who meet the clinical diagnosis criteria for hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), or healthcare-associated bacterial pneumonia (HCABP) * All subjects must fulfill at least 1 of the following clinical criteria at screening: 1. New onset or worsening of pulmonary symptoms or signs, such as cough, dyspnea, tachypnea (eg, respiratory rate \> 25 breaths/minute), expectorated sputum production, or requirement for mechanical ventilation 2. Hypoxemia (eg, a partial pressure of oxygen \[PaO2\] \< 60 mm Hg while the subject is breathing room air, as determined by arterial blood gas \[ABG\], or worsening of the ratio of the PaO2 to the fraction of inspired oxygen \[PaO2/FiO2\]) 3. Need for acute changes in the ventilator support system to enhance oxygenation, as determined by worsening oxygenation (ABG or PaO2/FiO2) or needed changes in the amount of positive end-expiratory pressure 4. New onset of or increase in (quantity or characteristics) suctioned respiratory secretions, demonstrating evidence of inflammation and absence of contamination * All subjects must have at least 1 of the following signs: 1. Documented fever (ie, core body temperature \[tympanic, rectal, esophageal\] ≥ 38°C \[100.4°F\], oral temperature ≥ 37.5°C, or axillary temperature ≥ 37°C) 2. Hypothermia (ie, core body temperature \[tympanic, rectal, esophageal\] ≤ 35°C \[95.0°F\], oral temperature ≤ 35.5°C and axillary temperature ≤ 36°C) 3. Leukocytosis with a total peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count ≥ 10,000 cells/mm³ 4. Leukopenia with total peripheral WBC count ≤ 4500 cells/mm³ 5. Greater than 15% immature neutrophils (bands) noted on peripheral blood smear * All subjects must have a chest radiograph during screening showing the presence of new or progressive infiltrate(s) suggestive of bacterial pneumonia. A computed tomography (CT) scan in the same time window showing the same findings could also be acceptable * All subjects must have a suspected Gram-negative infection involving the lower respiratory tract Exclusion Criteria: * Subjects who have known or suspected community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), atypical pneumonia, viral pneumonia, or chemical pneumonia (including aspiration of gastric contents, inhalation injury) * Other exclusions based on the prescribing information of meropenem or linezolid, prior antibiotic usage, age, and pregnancy.

Locations (119)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

All-cause Mortality Rate at Day 14

The all-cause mortality (ACM) rate at Day 14 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first infusion of study drug up to Day 14. The Modified Intent-to-Treat Population included all randomized participants who met either of the following criteria: * Evidence of Gram-negative infection of the lower respiratory tract based on a culture, Gram-stain, or other diagnostic test * Evidence of a lower respiratory tract infection but culture or other diagnostic tests did not provide a microbiologic diagnosis

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to Day 14

Secondary Outcomes

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Test of Cure (TOC)

Lower respiratory tract specimens (eg, sputum, endotracheal aspiration \[ETA\], endobronchial culture specimens collected by bronchoalveolar lavage \[BAL\], or protected specimen brush \[PSB\], lung biopsy tissue, pleural effusions, etc) were sent to the local microbiology laboratory for isolation and identification of pathogens. Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at TOC was determined by the sponsor as either Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen. Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.

Time frame: Test of cure (7 days after end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21)

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure

Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator as either Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Cure: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, including a reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no additional antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Shionogi Research Site

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Shionogi Research Site

DeLand, Florida, United States

Shionogi Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Shionogi Research Site

Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States

Shionogi Research Site

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Shionogi Research Site

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Shionogi Research Site

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Shionogi Research Site

Annapolis, Maryland, United States

Shionogi Research Site

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Shionogi Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

...and 109 more locations

Time frame: Test of cure (7 days after the end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21)

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Early Assessment (EA)

Time frame: Early assessment (Day 3-4 after the start of treatment)

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT)

Time frame: End of treatment (Day 7 to 14)

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU)

Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator at follow-up as either Sustained Clinical Cure, Relapse, or Indeterminate. Sustained Clinical Cure: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

Time frame: Follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment; Day 21 to 28)

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Early Assessment

Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at Early Assessment was determined by the sponsor as either Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen. Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.

Time frame: Early Assessment, Days 3 to 4

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at End of Treatment

Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at End of Treatment was determined by the sponsor as either: Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen. Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.

Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up

Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at Follow-up was determined by the sponsor as either Sustained Eradication, Persistence, Recurrence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen. Sustained eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy) after TOC. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed to be eradication.

Time frame: Follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment, Days 21 to 28)

All-cause Mortality Rate at Day 28

The all-cause mortality (ACM) rate at Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first dose of study drug up to Day 28.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to Day 28

All-cause Mortality Rate at the End of Study

The all-cause mortality rate during both the treatment and follow-up period (up to the end of study \[EOS\] visit) was calculated as the percentage of participants who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first infusion of study drug up to EOS. If a participant discontinued from the study before EOS and survival information was not available, then the survival status for this endpoint for the participant was considered unknown.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug through end of study (28 days after end of treatment, up to 42 days)

Total Hospitalization Time

The length of hospital stay attributable to the study-qualifying infection.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to test of cure (7 days after end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and to follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment; Day 21 to 28)

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded by the investigator according to the following definitions: * Mild: A finding or symptom is minor and does not interfere with usual daily activities. * Moderate: The event causes discomfort and interferes with usual daily activity or affects clinical status. * Severe: The event causes an interruption of the participant's usual daily activities or has a clinically significant effect. The relationship of each AE to the study treatment was determined by the investigator based on whether the AE could be reasonably explained as having been caused by the study drug (treatment related AE \[TRAE\]). An SAE is defined as any AE occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes: * Death * Life-threatening condition * Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for treatment * Persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Congenital anomaly/birth defect * Other medically important condition

Time frame: From first dose of study drug through the end of study, up to 42 days.