Calcium Silicate Versus Calcium Hydroxide in Two-step Indirect Pulp Treatment

Cairo University50 enrolled

Overview

Clinical and microbiological evaluation of Calcium silicate versus Calcium hydroxide in two-step indirect pulp treatment: Randomized clinical trial

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Deep Caries

Interventions

Calcium hydroxideOTHER

Pulp capping material

Calcium silicateOTHER

Pulp capping material

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 50 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * 18-50 years. * Males or females. * Co-operative patients approving to participate in the trial. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients younger than 19 years old or older than 50 years old. * Disabilities. * Systemic diseases or severe medically compromised. * Lack of compliance.

Locations (1)

Ehsan Hossam

Cairo, Giza Governorate, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain: VAS

post operative pain after 6 month from material application will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS)with score from 0 to 10 in which 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst pain

Time frame: 6 month

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.