The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and clinical benefits of the AMDS to treat patients with acute DeBakey type I dissections and/or intramural hematomas (IMH) involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch through open surgical repair.
AMDS is designed to complement the replacement of the ascending aorta with conventional surgical technique utilizing a conventional polyester graft. AMDS is constructed of an uncovered Nitinol wire braided stent attached proximally to a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) felt graft component. The PFTE felt graft component excludes the FL at the distal aortic anastomosis and the wire stent re-expands the dissection flap within the arch and descending aorta, which aims to treat malperfusion and promote positive remodeling of the aorta. The DARTS I Feasibility study is a prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded, single-arm, multi-institutional Canadian study evaluating the feasibility and safety of the AMDS graft. A goal of 40 subjects will be enrolled at approximately 5 sites in Canada. The enrollment period will span a minimum of 12 months from Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and site activation. Candidates for this study are adults who require repair of an acute DeBakey type I aorta dissection and/or intramural hematoma (IMH). Patients will be consented pre-operatively and enrolled patients will be followed for approximately 5 years after their AMDS implantation date. Data will be collected at 10 time points: baseline (pre-operatively), discharge, 1 month post-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, and 6 months post-operatively, 1 year post-operatively and thereafter, annually, for a total of 5 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
40
The device will be implanted during an already planned surgical intervention for aortic dissection repair. The participant will be observed and data gathered during the surgery and routine standard of care follow up visits.
Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
London Health Sciences Center- University Hospital
London, Ontario, Canada
University Health Network - Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Number of participants with device-related mortality
The number of patients with mortality related to the treatment device
Time frame: Early (within 30 days)
Number of participants with device-related mortality
The number of patients with mortality related to the treatment device
Time frame: Intermediate (3 months)
Number of participants with device-related mortality
The number of patients with mortality related to the treatment device
Time frame: Late (6 months)
Number of participants with neurological complications (TIA, stroke)
The number of patients with neurological complications related to the treatment device
Time frame: Early (within 30 days)
Number of participants with neurological complications (TIA, stroke)
The number of patients with neurological complications related to the treatment device
Time frame: Intermediate (3 months)
Number of participants with neurological complications (TIA, stroke)
The number of patients with neurological complications related to the treatment device
Time frame: Late (6 months)
Thrombosis of the false lumen within the confines of the device
Efficacy outcome: Number of participants with false lumen exclusion within the treatment area confined by the treatment device.
Time frame: Annually, through study completion, an average of 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Centre Hospitalier de I'Universite de Montreal (CHUM)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Assess need for stent removal
Stent placement and retention. The number of patients requiring removal of the stent.
Time frame: Annually, through study completion, an average of 5 years
Successful reattachment of the intimal flap within the arch
The number of patients that has successful reattachment of the intimal flap within the arch following the implantation of AMDS
Time frame: Annually, through study completion, an average of 5 years
Successful device deployment, and radiographic evidence of false lumen exclusion within the confines of the device
The number of patients which has successful AMDS deployment and which also had radiographic evidence of false lumen exclusion within the confines of AMDS
Time frame: Annually, through study completion, an average of 5 years