Compare the safety and efficacy of remote magnetic navigation-guided ablation and cryoablation for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
1. Compare the efficacy of remote magnetic navigation-guided ablation and cryoablation for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. 2. Compare the safety of remote magnetic navigation-guided ablation and cryoablation for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. 3. Compare the procedural parameters of remote magnetic navigation-guided ablation and cryoablation for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. 4. Compare the effects of amiodarone on recurrence after these two different ablation procedures.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
200
Pulmonary vein isolation and other areas ablation guided by remote magnetic navigation
Pulmonary vein isolation and other areas ablation used by cryoballoon
Clinical efficacy (time to first AF recurrence after blanking period)
the time to first AF recurrence after blanking period (month)
Time frame: one year
Clinical safety (Any procedure-related complications)
Any procedure-related complications
Time frame: one year
Procedure time (min)
Time frame: one week
Time to first cardiovascular hospitalization (month)
Time frame: one year
QoL of 12 months (Units on a Scale)
Time frame: one year
X-ray time (min)
Time frame: one week
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.