This study will address the effectiveness of Family-centered Function Focused Care (Fam-FFC). Fam-FFC is a theoretically-based approach to care in which family caregivers partner with nurses to prevent functional decline and other complications related to hospitalization in older adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. A systematic care pathway promotes information-sharing and decision-making that promotes physical activity, function, and cognitive stimulation during the hospitalization and immediate post-acute period. Our goal in this work is to establish a practical and effective way to optimize function and physical activity; decrease neuropsychiatric symptoms, delirium, and depression; prevent avoidable post-acute care dependency; and prevent unnecessary rehospitalizations and long-stay nursing home admissions, while mitigating family caregiver strain and burden.
Older persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are about two times as likely to be hospitalized as their peers who are cognitively healthy. The care of hospitalized persons with ADRD has traditionally focused on the acute medical problem that led to admission with little attention paid to functional recovery. Older persons with ADRD are at greater risk for functional decline and increased care dependency after discharge due to a combination of intrinsic factors, environmental, policy, and care practices that restrict physical and cognitive activity, and limited staff knowledge of dementia care. Family caregivers (CGs) can play an important role in promoting the functional recovery of hospitalized older adults. They can provide vital information, offer motivation and support of function-focused care, and assume responsibility in varying degrees for post-acute care delivery and coordination. Family-centered FFC (Fam-FFC) incorporates an educational empowerment model for family CGs provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery. In this patient/family-centered care approach, nurses purposefully engage family CGs in the assessment, decision-making, care delivery and evaluation of function-focused care during hospitalization and the 60-day post-acute period. In the proposed project, we will implement Fam-FFC in a cluster randomized trial of 438 patient/CG dyads in six hospital units randomized within three hospitals (73 dyads per unit) to accomplish the following aims: Aim 1: Validate the efficacy of Fam-FFC on physical function (ADLs/ performance and physical activity), delirium occurrence and severity, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and mood; Aim 2: Evaluate the impact of Fam-FFC on family CG-centered outcomes (preparedness for caregiving, strain, burden, and desire to institutionalize); and Aim 3: Evaluate the relative costs for Fam-FFC v. control condition, and calculate health care cost (post-acute health care utilization) and total cost savings for Fam-FFC. We will also evaluate the cultural appropriateness of Fam-FCC for diverse families in our sample. Dyads will be composed of community-residing, hospitalized medical patients with very mild to moderate dementia (0.5 to 2.0 on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale) and their CG (defined as the primary person providing oversight and support on an ongoing basis). Outcomes will be evaluated at hospital admission, within 72 hours of discharge, and two and six months post-discharge. This study will be a critical next step in delineating how to partner with family CGs to change acute care approaches provided to patients with ADRD so as to optimize function after discharge, and promote delirium abatement and well-being in these individuals. The societal implications of helping older individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias avoid functional decline are enormous in terms of aging in place, quality of life, cost, and caregiver burden. The study findings will be relevant for other areas of behavior change research in acute care, specifically those related to engaging patients and families in health care planning, delivery, and evaluation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
461
An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Lancaster General Medical Center
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Presbyterian Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Chester County Hospital
West Chester, Pennsylvania, United States
Return to Baseline Physical Function Based on the Barthel Index (Change From 2 Weeks Prior to Admission and Changes at Admission, Discharge, and 2 and 6 Months Post-discharge).
Assessed using the Barthel Index, comparing the change from 2 weeks prior to admission to changes at admission, discharge, and 2 and 6 months post-discharge. Return to baseline physical function (yes/no) was scored as yes if the participant's functional status was the same as baseline, within five points or less than baseline, or greater than baseline. Scores ranged from 0 to 1, with higher scores representing better outcomes.
Time frame: Change from 2 weeks prior to admission to changes at admission, discharge, and 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Caregiver Preparedness
Assessed by the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale with scores ranging from 0 to 4 and higher scores indicating greater perceived preparedness.
Time frame: Discharge and 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Delirium Severity
Assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method Short Form with scores ranging from 0-7 and higher scores indicating more delirium severity.
Time frame: Admission, Discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Behavior
Assessed by the Brief Neuropsychiatric Inventory with scores ranging from 0 to 36 and higher scores indicating greater behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.
Time frame: Admission, Discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Moderate Physical Activity Level
Actigraphy data, measured by the MotionWatch 8, includes minutes spent in moderate activity.
Time frame: admission, discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Depression
Assessed by the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia with total scores ranging between 0 to 38 and higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.
Time frame: admission, discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Caregiver Strain
Assessed by the Modified Caregiver Strain Index with total scores ranging from 0 to 26 and higher scores indicating greater caregiver strain.
Time frame: Discharge and 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Caregiver Burden
Assessed using the Short Form Zarit Burden Interview with total scores total scores ranging from 0 to 48, with higher scores corresponding to higher levels of caregiver burden.
Time frame: Discharge and 2 and 6 months post discharge.
Caregiver Anxiety
Assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression subscale with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 and higher scores indicating greater levels of caregiver anxiety.
Time frame: Discharge and 2 and 6 months
Falls
Number of falls a week after hospital discharge and 2 and 6 months post discharge.
Time frame: discharge and 2 and 6 months
Hospitalizations
Number of hospitalizations within a week after discharge; number of hospitalizations between discharge to 2 months post-discharge; number of hospitalizations between 2 months post-discharge and 6 months post-discharge.
Time frame: discharge and 2 and 6 months
Emergency Room (ER) Visits
Number of ER visits within a week after discharge; number of ER visits between discharge to 2 months post-discharge; number of ER visits between 2 months post-discharge and 6 months post-discharge.
Time frame: discharge and 2 and 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.