This a Phase 2a, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled 3 arm study to assess the safety and tolerability of multiple oral doses of REL-1017 25 mg and 50 mg as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD). The patients will be adults with MDD who are diagnosed with a current MDE who have experienced an inadequate response to 1 to 3 courses of treatment with an antidepressant medication. This population will provide the opportunity to compare the safety and efficacy effects of treatment with an approved antidepressant in conjunction with REL-1017 versus the effects of an antidepressant alone. This study includes in-patient and out-patient periods.
Currently available medications have proven to be useful for the treatment of depression, but also have limitations including low response rates, a significant number of treatment resistant patients, and time-lag for response, which emphasizes a major unmet need for more efficacious and faster-acting antidepressants. Recent studies have demonstrated that ketamine, a non-competitive glutamate-N-methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, produces rapid onset (2 hours) and long-lasting (7 days) antidepressant actions in treatment resistant patients. This rapid action, by a mechanism completely different from typical monoamine reuptake inhibitors, represents a significant finding in the field of depression. Racemic methadone, the 50/50 combination of d-methadone and l-methadone, has been in widespread use for decades and has been studied extensively. Methadone is currently approved for use in the management of severe pain, detoxification treatment of opioid addiction, and maintenance treatment of opioid addiction. The results of a study evaluating the receptor binding profiles of racemic methadone and its stereoisomers suggest that d-methadone does not essentially contribute to the opioid effect of racemic methadone and that it has a 10 times lower affinity for the mu1, mu2, and delta opioid receptors compared to l-methadone. Racemic methadone and its d- and l isomers exhibit similar affinities for the non-competitive binding site of the NMDA receptor and are non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonists. In the forced swim test, a rodent behavioral model of antidepressant activity, both ketamine and d-methadone at all doses tested significantly decreased the immobility of the rats compared to the vehicle suggesting antidepressant like activity. Neither drug increased spontaneous locomotor activity. Relmada has conducted 2 clinical studies to identify the dose levels of REL-1017 (d-methadone) that have little to no opioid effects and that are expected to possess NMDA antagonistic properties for the evaluation of oral REL-1017 in the treatment of MDD and neuropathic pain conditions. Initial Phase 1 single ascending dose and multiple ascending dose clinical studies of REL-1017 were designed to evaluate the safety and tolerance of the pure d methadone isomer in healthy opioid-naïve subjects and identify a safe and potentially effective dose range in this population. These studies showed that REL-1017 was safe and well-tolerated at single oral doses up to 150 mg (maximum tolerated dose) and up to 75 mg administered once daily for 10 days in healthy opioid-naïve subjects. The pre-clinical and previous clinical experience with REL-1017 (d-methadone) provided the basis for the initiation of the present study, which will extend the evaluation of the safety, tolerability, and PK of REL-1017 at 2 doses with repeated administration to depressed patients. Since REL-1017 is proposed for use as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD), the patients will be male adults with MDD who are diagnosed with a current depressive episode who have experienced an inadequate response to 1 to 3 courses of treatment with an antidepressant medication. Based on the safety data from Protocol REL-1017-111, single doses of 5 mg, 20 mg, 60 mg, 100 mg, and 150 mg of REL-1017 or placebo were well tolerated. The results of Protocol REL-1017-112 evaluated 10 days of dosing with 25 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg of REL-1017 or placebo, and no impact on safety was observed. In spite of the confirmed dose proportionality, the comparison of concentration and exposure between the 50 mg and 75 mg REL-1017 treatment groups demonstrated only slight differences. Consequently, 25 mg and 50 mg doses were chosen for administration in Protocol REL-1017-202 as single daily doses over a period of 7 days. Thus, as a single isomer of racemic methadone, d-methadone has been shown to possess NMDA antagonist properties with virtually no opioid activity or ketamine-like toxicities at the expected therapeutic doses. In this study, adult male patients with MDD who are diagnosed with a current MDE and who have experienced an inadequate response to 1 to 3 courses of treatment with an antidepressant medication will be randomized to study drug in a 1:1:1 ratio. Approximately 15 patients each will receive REL-1017 25 mg, REL-1017 50 mg, or placebo once daily for 7 days. Endpoints include assessments of safety, tolerability, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of REL-1017. Patients will be required to stay in the clinic for 10 days and will then be followed as an outpatient for 12 additional days.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
62
REL-1017 will be administered as an oral solution. Patients will continue to take the same, stabilized antidepressant medication that they were taking at screening throughout the course of the study.
Placebo will be administered as an oral solution. Patients will continue to take the same, stabilized antidepressant medication that they were taking at screening throughout the course of the study.
Woodland International Research Group
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Collaborative Neuroscience Network, LLC
Garden Grove, California, United States
Artemis Institute for Clinical Research
San Diego, California, United States
Innovative Clinical Research, Inc
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Atlanta Center for Medical Research
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
iResearch Atlanta, LLC
Decatur, Georgia, United States
St. Louis Clinical Trials, LLC
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Hassman Research Institute
Berlin, New Jersey, United States
Midwest Clinical Research Center
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Pillar Clinical Research, LLC
Richardson, Texas, United States
Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) [Safety and Tolerability]
Spontaneously reported or observed AEs will be recorded and reported throughout the study, and AEs will be elicited using a non-leading question at every visit from Screening through the Day 21 assessment. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation patient administered a pharmaceutical product and may not necessarily have a causal relationship with the administered treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including a clinically significant laboratory abnormality, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, regardless of relationship to the medicinal (investigational) product. During the study, an AE could also occur outside the time that the investigational product(s) was given (e.g., during the time from discontinuation of prohibited medications).
Time frame: 21 days
ECG Parameters [Safety]
12-Lead ECGs will be performed and reported at Screening; at Check In (Day -1); Days 1 through 9; and at Day 14.
Time frame: Screening, Day -1, Day 1 hour 2, 8, Day 2 hour 2, 8, Day 3-7 hour 2, Day 8, Day 9, and Day 14
Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) [Safety and Tolerability]
The C-SSRS will be administered and reported at Screening and Check In (Day -1); and at Days 1, 2, 8, 9 and 14. The C-SSRS is routinely used to quantify the severity of suicidal ideation and behavior. Both the ideation and behavior subscales are sensitive to change over time. The scale identifies behaviors that may be indicative of an individual's intent to commit suicide. This measure contains 6 "yes" or "no" questions in which respondents are asked to indicate whether they have experienced several thoughts or feelings relating to suicide over the past month. Each question addresses a different component of the respondent's suicide ideation severity: (1) Desire to be dead; (2) Suicidal thoughts; (3) Consideration of suicide methods; (4) Formed intent to commit suicide; (5) Completed suicide plan; and (6) Initiated suicide plan. A higher score indicates a higher intensity of suicidal ideation.
Time frame: Day -1, Day 1, Day 2, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 14
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS)
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) will be administered and reported on Days 4, 7, and 14. The MADRS questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms: (1) Apparent sadness; (2) Reported sadness; (3) Inner tension; (4) Reduced sleep; (5) Reduced appetite; (6) Concentration difficulties; (7) Lassitude; (8) Inability to feel; (9) Pessimistic thoughts; (10) Suicidal thoughts. A higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60 with scores above 34 indicating severe depression. In Study REL-1017-202, the MADRS was administered using the Structured Interview Guide for the MADRS (SIGMA). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Day 7
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS)
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) will be administered and reported on Days 4, 7, and 14. The MADRS questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms: (1) Apparent sadness; (2) Reported sadness; (3) Inner tension; (4) Reduced sleep; (5) Reduced appetite; (6) Concentration difficulties; (7) Lassitude; (8) Inability to feel; (9) Pessimistic thoughts; (10) Suicidal thoughts. A higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60 with scores above 34 indicating severe depression. In Study REL-1017-202, the MADRS was administered using the Structured Interview Guide for the MADRS (SIGMA). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Day 14
Symptoms of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ)
Symptoms of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ) will be administered and reported on Days 4, 7, and 14. The SDQ is a 44-item, self-report scale designed to measure the severity of symptoms across several subtypes of depression. The SDQ was developed to more fully capture the heterogeneity of symptom presentations of depressive disorders than current, widely used scales for MDD. The SDQ includes items that inquire about an extensive number of depressive symptoms beyond the ones included in other commonly used scales. The 44 SDQ items are rated on a 6-point scale. The total score is the sum of 44 items and can range from 44 to 264. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. 1 = Better than Normal; 2= Normal; 3= Minimally Sad; 4= Moderately Sad; 5= Markedly Sad; 6= Extremely Sad
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Day 7
Symptoms of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ)
Symptoms of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ) will be administered and reported on Days 4, 7, and 14. The SDQ is a 44-item, self-report scale designed to measure the severity of symptoms across several subtypes of depression. The SDQ was developed to more fully capture the heterogeneity of symptom presentations of depressive disorders than current, widely used scales for MDD. The SDQ includes items that inquire about an extensive number of depressive symptoms beyond the ones included in other commonly used scales. The 44 SDQ items are rated on a 6-point scale. The total score is the sum of 44 items and can range from 44 to 264. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. 1 = Better than Normal; 2= Normal; 3= Minimally Sad; 4= Moderately Sad; 5= Markedly Sad; 6= Extremely Sad
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Day 14
Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S)
Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S) will be administered and reported on Days 4, 7, and 14. The CGI-S is a standard method used in clinical studies to quantify and track patient progress and treatment response over time. The scale is composed of 7 ratings: 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill patients. The score ranges from 1 to 7, and a lower CGI-S score indicates lower levels of depression.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Day 7
Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S)
Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S) will be administered and reported on Days 4, 7, and 14. The CGI-S is a standard method used in clinical studies to quantify and track patient progress and treatment response over time. The scale is composed of 7 ratings: 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill patients. The score ranges from 1 to 7, and a lower CGI-S score indicates lower levels of depression.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Day 14
Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I)
Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) will be administered and reported at Days 4, 7 and 14. The CGI-I is a standard method used in clinical studies to quantify and track patient change over time. The scale is composed of 7 ratings: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; and 7 = very much worse. The score ranges from 1 to 7, and a lower CGI-I score indicates greater improvement in symptoms.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Day 7
Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I)
Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) will be administered and reported at Days 4, 7 and 14. The CGI-I is a standard method used in clinical studies to quantify and track patient change over time. The scale is composed of 7 ratings: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; and 7 = very much worse. The score ranges from 1 to 7, and a lower CGI-I score indicates greater improvement in symptoms.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to Day 14
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) [Pharmacokinetic]
The pharmacokinetic parameters of REL-1017 25 mg and 50 mg will be evaluated on Day 1 through Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, and Day 14 where the data allow.
Time frame: Day 1 (hour -1, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero Until the Dosing Interval of 24 Hours (AUCtau) [Pharmacokinetic]
The pharmacokinetic parameters of REL-1017 25 mg and 50 mg will be evaluated on Day 1 through Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, and Day 14 where the data allow.
Time frame: Day 1 (hour -1, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24)
Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) [Pharmacokinetic]
The pharmacokinetic parameters of REL-1017 25 mg and 50 mg will be evaluated on Day 1 through Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, and Day 14 where the data allow.
Time frame: Day 1 (hour -1, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) [Pharmacokinetic]
The pharmacokinetic parameters of REL-1017 25 mg and 50 mg will be evaluated on Day 1 through Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, and Day 14 where the data allow.
Time frame: Day 1 (hour -1, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24)
Apparent Terminal Elimination Half-life (t½) [Pharmacokinetic]
The pharmacokinetic parameters of REL-1017 25 mg and 50 mg will be evaluated on Day 1 through Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, and Day 14 where the data allow.
Time frame: Day 1 (hour -1, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24) and Day 7 (hour 24, 48, and 168 post last dose)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.