This study will examine the effects of a portable of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) device (MD Cure, Aerotel, USA) compared with a sham device on patient-reported outcomes of pain and function in patients with either acute/subacute or chronic low back pain (LBP).
This study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study comparing usual care + PEMF with usual care + sham. The investigators will recruit patients with LBP from the University of Bridgeport chiropractic clinic, and will enroll 80 total subjects: 40 with acute or subacute LBP, and 40 with chronic LBP. Within each of those populations the investigators will assign 20 subjects to receive usual care + PEMF, and 20 to receive usual care + sham. The investigators will track any other treatments initiated or discontinued during the trial. Patients who agree to participate with be randomly given a functional PEMF device or a sham unit. Patients and clinicians will be blinded to the assignment. All subjects will be given the same instructions for daily use of the devices, and will continue to receive usual follow-up at the UBCC clinic as indicated. The investigators will collect patient-reported measures of pain and function pain at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks, and will collect data on adverse effects at each visit and at 6 and 12 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
80
Battery powered portable pulsed electromagnetic therapy device
University of Bridgeport
Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
RECRUITINGChange in pain intensity
Numerical Rating Scale
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 6 and 12
Change in low back pain related disability
Oswestry Disability Index
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 6 and 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.