Because of the limiting data about an efficacy and safety of fractional radiofrequency for the treatment of hyperhidrosis, this study aim to compare clinical efficacy by Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Score (HDSS) between Fractional Microneedle Radiofrequency device and intradermal Botulinum toxin type A injection for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis. The secondary objectives to determine the improvement change of iodine starch test, total amount of sweat production by trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL), patient's satisfaction and their quality of life by Dermatology Life Quality Index and side effect between the groups.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
40
The change of Hyperhidrosis disease severity score (HDSS) at week-12 with the baseline
Hyperhidrosis disease severity score will be assessed by study subjects that is categorized to 4 levels; (1) my axillary sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily activities (2) my axillary sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities (3) my axillary sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities (4) my axillary sweating is intolerable and always interferes with my daily activities
Time frame: 12 weeks
Iodine starch test
Qualitative test used to evaluate sudo-motor function (sweating) which method is to apply iodine solution to the skin. Once dry, the area is dusted with cornstarch or potato flour then sweating is encouraged. When sweat reaches the surface of the skin the starch and iodine combine causing a dramatic color change from yellow to dark blue allowing sweat production to be actively visualized. Photograph from iodine starch test will be assessed by two independent clinical assessors who are blinded to study protocol and grading with score. The investigators will prepare the photo with pre- and post-treatment set. Each set will contain 6 photos, 3 photos from the left and 3 photos from the right. Prepare by using Microsoft PowerPoint program, on each slide will contain 2 photos, pre-treatment photos on the left and post treatment photos on the right. The paired photos will be assessed and graded the score at different time points (4 and 12 weeks) on each side of axilla
Time frame: baseline, week 4 and week 12
Participants' satisfaction assessment
An assessment will be determined at the endpoint visit (4th-12thweek) after the treatment by study subjects by Quartile rating scale on each side of axilla. Quartile rating scale by comparing with the baseline that is categorized to 4 levels; (3) greatly satisfy with treatment result (2) moderately satisfy with treatment result (1) slightly satisfy with treatment result (0) No different with treatment result.
Time frame: week 4 and week 12
Adverse effect
Side effect
Time frame: 12 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.