The investigators plan to assess the efficacy of standard and low dose HCTZ treatment in the recurrence prevention of calcium-containing kidney stones. More specifically, the investigators aim to assess the dose-response relationship for three different dosages of HCTZ. Study intervention: HCTZ 12.5 mg, 25 mg or 50 mg once daily per os for 24 or 36 months. In addition, all patients in HCTZ treatment arms will receive state-of-the-art non-pharmacologic recommendations for stone prevention according to current guidelines. Control intervention: Placebo once daily per os for 24 to 36 months. In addition, all patients in the placebo arm will receive state-of-the-art non-pharmacologic recommendations for stone prevention according to current guidelines.
Nephrolithiasis is a global healthcare problem with a current lifetime risk of 18.8% in men and 9.4% in women. Without specific treatment, 5- and 20-year recurrence rates are 40% and 75%, respectively. Given the high cost of medical treatments and surgical interventions as well as the morbidity related to symptomatic stone disease, medical prophylaxis for stone recurrence is an attractive approach. About 80-90% of stones are composed of calcium oxalate with various admixtures of calcium phosphate. Increased excretion of calcium in the urine, hypercalciuria, is the most common metabolic abnormality encountered in patients with recurrent nephrolithiasis. Thiazide diuretics have been the cornerstone of pharmacologic metaphylaxis for more than 40 years. The effect of thiazides to reduce the risk of stone recurrence has been attributed to their ability to decrease urinary calcium excretion. However, other factors, such as reduction of urinary pH and urinary oxalate excretion, probably contribute to this effect. Efficacy of thiazides on recurrence prevention of calcareous nephrolithiasis was tested in 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). With the exception of two trials, thiazides significantly reduced stone recurrence. Most of these trials are from the 1980's and 90's and the cumulative number of patients studied is remarkably low for such a prevalent disease. Our systematic review of these RCTs revealed major methodological deficiencies in all trials, including: lack of double-blinding and intention-to-treat analysis, unclear allocation concealment, lack of adverse event and drop out reporting and unknown baseline risk of disease severity. Furthermore, high doses of thiazides were employed in all trials, in the case of the best studied thiazide, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), up to 100 mg daily. At such high doses, side effects occur frequently. Nowadays, thiazides are widely used in the treatment of recurrent nephrolithiasis and arterial hypertension, but at significantly lower doses. In the case of recurrent nephrolithiasis, however, this practice is not supported by randomized evidence and consequently, the investigators do not know whether the currently employed low dose thiazide regimens are effective in reducing the risk for stone recurrence. Thus, evidence for benefits and harms of thiazide diuretics in the prevention of calcium-containing kidney stones in general remains unclear. In addition, the efficacy of the currently employed low dose thiazide regimens to prevent stone recurrence is not known.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
416
Once daily for 3 years
Once daily for 3 years
Once daily for 3 years
Once daily for 3 years
Kantonsspital Aarau
Aarau, Switzerland
University Hospital Basel
Basel, Switzerland
Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli (San Giovanni)
Bellinzona, Switzerland
Bern University Hospital (Inselspital)
Bern, Switzerland
Kantonsspital Graubünden
Chur, Switzerland
Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève (HUG)
Geneva, Switzerland
Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV)
Lausanne, Switzerland
Luzerner Kantonsspital
Lucerne, Switzerland
Ospedale Regionale di Lugano (Civico)
Lugano, Switzerland
Kantonsspital St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen, Switzerland
...and 2 more locations
Number of Participants With Stone Recurrences
Composite of symptomatic or radiological recurrences, defined as either a symptomatic kidney stone passage or radiological kidney stone recurrence on CT. Symptomatic recurrence was defined as the visible passage of a stone with or without accompanying typical symptoms (such as flank or loin pain and hematuria) or as the presence of a symptomatic or asymptomatic stone that was determined to require surgical removal. If a patient had symptoms during the trial that were suggestive of a possible stone passage but no visible stone had been observed, local investigators evaluated the symptoms of the patient and judged whether a stone passage had occurred. Radiological recurrence was defined as a new stone formed or enlargement of a preexisting stone.
Time frame: After 3 years
Number of Symptomatic Stone Recurrences
Symptomatic recurrence was defined as the visible passage of a stone with or without accompanying typical symptoms (such as flank or loin pain and hematuria) or as the presence of a symptomatic or asymptomatic stone that was determined to require surgical removal. If a patient had symptoms during the trial that were suggestive of a possible stone passage but no visible stone had been observed, local investigators evaluated the symptoms of the patient and judged whether a stone passage had occurred.
Time frame: After 3 years
Number of Radiologic Stone Recurrences.
Radiological stone recurrence was defined as a new stone formed or enlargement of a preexisting stone (assessed by low-dose CT of the kidney at the end of the study compared to the low-dose CT of the kidney at the baseline visit).
Time frame: After 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.