The feasibility randomised controlled trial is part of the EU funded project "PreventIT" (2016-2018) responding to the Horizon 2020, Personalised health and care (PHC), call PHC-21: Advancing active and healthy ageing with ICT: Early risk detection and intervention. The PreventIT project focuses on a new behaviour change activity approach for young older adults (61-70 years of age) with an overall aim of early prevention of functional decline and to empower people to take care of their own health.
In this feasibility randomised controlled trial two interventions are compared with a control group. The aLiFE programme includes instructor and paper manual delivery of life-style integrated activities, while the eLiFE programme delivers the same activities by use of smartphone and smartwatch applications. The control group is asked to follow the World Health Organisation's physical activity recommendations. The main aim is to assess feasibility of the aLiFE and eLiFE programmes and a second aim to suggest sample size and design for a future Phase III clinical trial. OBJECTIVES: How is the feasibility of having young older adults (between 61-70 years) to perform the aLiFE and eLiFE interventions. Specifically: 1. Participation: How is the adherence of specific activities and to the entire aLiFE and eLiFE interventions of young older adults? 2. Technology: How is the feasibility and usability of the eLiFE intervention delivered using smartphones and smartwatches as platform, regarding user interface, goal setting, feedback, motivational messages, and social interaction? 3. Outcome measures: How is the risk reduction of functional decline, measured by the Later Life Function and Disability Instrument and behavioural complexity, for the aLiFE and the eLiFE interventions compared to a control group, and what are the estimates of effect sizes for the primary and secondary study outcome measure? 4. Health economics evaluation: Is it feasible to collect data on, and estimate, health care resource utilization, costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and model incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of aLiFE, eLiFE compared with the control group over a 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month time horizon? The study is approved by the three ethical sites prior to study start. (October 3rd, 2017) The final Data Analysis Plan has been closed before the start of the first post-test assessment in the PreventIT feasibility RCT, starting on the 4th of October 2017.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
The aLiFE programme is taught by an instructor during six home visits and 3 phone calls during the 6-month intervention period. The programme will be personalised by use of an initial balance and strength assessment (aLiFE assessment tool). The participants assigns activities to his or her daily activities, and during subsequent home visits, the number of activities and task demands are upgraded. Participants will be taught how to select opportunities themselves to embed activities into their individual daily routine, and how to progress over time.
The eLIFE includes a personalised ICT-administered training schedule using the activities developed in aLiFE, delivered in the form of video clips, pictures and text/verbal instructions on a smartphone and smartwatch application. Personalisation of activity content will be decided based on a phenotype tool and initial difficulty level is decided through the aLiFE assessment tool. In addition, a virtual instructor teaches the participants how to carry out the eLiFE programme. The user receives motivational messages and feedback, and there will be a possibility for social interaction between the participants. The instructors teach the eLiFE participants the programme during 4 home visits and 3 phone calls during the 6 month intervention period.
Klinik für Geriatrische Rehabilitation
Stuttgart, Germany
MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, Amsterdam Center on Aging
Amsterdam, Netherlands
NTNU
Trondheim, Norway
Self-reported function and disability
Measured using the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI)
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Behavioural complexity metric
A composite measure of physical activity, sleep, and social participation, measured by a unitless scale. Physical activity and sleep is objectively measured by activity monitors worn at the lower back and the wrist, while social interaction is assessed as phone calls.
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Balance and mobility
Assessed by the Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CB\&M)
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Static balance
Assessed by the Eight Level Balance Scale
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Gait speed
will be measured during a 4 m walk at usual pace and 7m walk at usual and fast pace
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Grip Strength
will be measured by the JAMAR dynamometer (kg)
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Functional Leg Strength
assessed by the 5-chair stand
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Cognitive function
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
180
The control group follows the World Health Organization's recommendations of physical activity. The control participants will receive one home visit and be given a written letter with the activity recommendations.
assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Tool (MoCA)
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Mood
Self-reported by use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Fear of falling
short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (short FESI)
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Health related quality of life
as assessed by the EuroQol - EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Health related quality of life
as assessed by the Short Form Quality of Life (SF-12)
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Instrumented functional strength
Instrumented 30sec chair stand
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Instrumented standing balance
Instrumented Static balance
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Instrumented mobility
Instrumented Time up and go test (iTUG)
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Number of participants completing the different parts of the study
Flow of participants during the study (number of completers and drop outs at different phases of the study)
Time frame: Screening, baseline, 6 months, and 12 months follow up
Adverse Events
Numbers, description, and severity reported by the assessors and instructors
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 months
Experience with the interventions, including motivation and behaviour change
7-point Likert Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Experience with the interventions, including motivation and behaviour change
Focus group interview
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Process evaluation
Focus group interview
Time frame: 12 months
Technology evaluation
the System Usability Scale
Time frame: 6 months and 12 month follow up
Technology evaluation
the Telehealthcare Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time frame: 6 months and 12 month follow up
Attendance and adherence intervention
Single question every four week (email or mail)
Time frame: From date of first home visit until the date of the 12 month follow-up, assessed up to 12 months
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)
Short Form Quality of Life (SF-12)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)
EuroQol - EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Cost-effectiveness
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Acceptance of self-administered tests
Self-assessment test battery for physical function
Time frame: Baseline and 12 month follow up
Accelerometer Collected percentages of sedentary time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected duration of sedentary time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected intensity (metabolic equivalent) of sedentary time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected percentages of walking time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected duration of walking time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected intensity (metabolic equivalent) of walking time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected percentages of active time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected duration of active time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected intensity (metabolic equivalent) of active time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months