Viral infections remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), especially after myelo-ablative conditioning and if the donor is antigen-mismatched or haplo-identical.. In the described setting the patient's own immune system has been destroyed by the necessary highly immuno- and myelo-ablative conditioning and all memory against infections has been deleted. Therefore, there is a high risk for several viral infections and other infectious organisms.Both primary viral infections and reactivations can occur, and patients can become refractory to antiviral treatments, or in some cases an adequate antiviral treatment is unavailable or too toxic. In this study, the investigators will target CMV, as refractory CMV infection and disease is accompanied by an extremely high mortality rate and therefore the development of new treatment approaches is required. Despite the available antiviral drugs, a considerable number of patients are facing an insufficient control of CMV reactivation after SCT. Because reconstitution of CMV-specific T cells confer protection against the development of CMV disease after SCT, attempts have been made to restore antiviral immunity by direct infusion of CMV-specific T cells. Most clinical cellular immunotherapy protocols for CMV treatment have used CMV-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell lines generated by repetitive in vitro stimulation with CMV antigens with success. Despite the proven efficacy, use of cellular therapy in the clinic has been limited, because the approach is time and labor consuming and requires specialized facility allowing handling of the therapeutic cells according to good manufacturing practice. In addition, no sustained response was seen after adoptive transfer that involved only cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. This phenomenon is supported by the fact that recall responses to latent infections depend on the presence of CD4+ T cells to help cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. An alternative approach for the transfer of T-cell immunity is the isolation of Ag-specific T cells ex vivo from the blood of CMV seropositive donors, based on interferon γ (IFN-γ) secretion of T cells after in vitro stimulation with viral Ag, resulting in a combination of CD4+ T helper and cytotoxic CD8+ CMV specific T cells. Using this strategy, a short-term ex vivo protocol was developed for the isolation of pp65 (CMV immunodominant protein)-specific T cells. Since then, several centers have used this protocol in the clinic, infusing low numbers of pp65-specific T cells, that were able to restore protective T-cell immunity against CMV in a post SCT setting in patients with refractory CMV disease or viremia. For this protocol the investigators have set up and validated this method of CMV-specific T-cell generation in the Ghent University Hospital and the investigators will make it available for other Belgian transplant centers.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1
Continue with the anti-viral treatment as per standard of care.
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
ZNA Stuivenberg
Antwerp, Belgium
AZ Sint-Jan Brugge
Bruges, Belgium
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, Belgium
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Brussels, Belgium
Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc
Brussels, Belgium
Université de Liège
Liège, Belgium
Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis Roeselare
Roeselare, Belgium
Percentage of patients for whom the investigator can manufacture a product that meets release criteria, and can therefore receive the product.
Starting from patients and donors that fulfill all inclusion criteria and do not have any exclusion criterium, and donors fulfilling all pre-apheresis criteria.
Time frame: Within 1 year after the last follow-up visit of the last patient.
Safety of the administered cell product in terms of Graft-versus-Host-Disease occurence/worsening.
Evaluation of the frequency of patients who develop de novo or recurrent (with a history of (completely recovered)) acute GVHD grade 2 or more or show worsening of an existing aGVHD with at least 1 grade, or emergence of an additional organ involved.
Time frame: Within 1 year after the last follow-up visit of the last patient.
Clinical efficacy measured by change in CMV PCR or resolution of CMV disease.
Clinical efficacy has already been shown (albeit not in a randomized phase 3 trial) but as there is no alternative therapy for these patients (except for continuing the therapy they are already getting and to which they are not (longer) responding, this study is not placebo or best supportive care controlled, but is designed as a single arm study. However, by including all patients who can get the product in the treatment arm and those who can't get the product in the observational arm, the study will be able to have a control group without randomization.
Time frame: Within 1 year after the last follow-up visit of the last patient.
Evaluation of infusion related adverse event as per CTCAE 4.03.
Time frame: Within 1 year after the last follow-up visit of the last patient.
Explore the relationship between the presence of CMV specific T cells in the peripheral blood of the patient and the objective clinical response
Time frame: Within 1 year after the last follow-up visit of the last patient.
Make the treatment of relapsing or refractory CMV infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with CMV-specific T cell therapy from the CMV positive donor available for patients in Belgium
Time frame: Within 1 year after the last follow-up visit of the last patient.
Compare resistance to antiviral therapy in both arms (investigational vs. observational) b measuring change in CMV PCR or evaluating resolution of CMV disease.
Time frame: Within 1 year after the last follow-up visit of the last patient.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.