In recent years the concept of organ sparing treatment in rectal cancer was introduced for selected good responders after neo-adjuvant treatment. In these patients replacement of the standard of care total mesorectal excision (TME) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) or omission of surgery after chemoradiation (CRT) was proposed. Before organ sparing treatments could be applied in clinical practice a reliable patient selection procedure has to be available as only good treatment responders after neo-adjuvant therapy are candidates for such adapted therapy. Different imaging modalities have been studied for their ability to distinguish good treatment responders from others. Examples of such imaging modalities with some promising results regarding response assessment are fludeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography (FDG-PET), T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (T2w-MRI), dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion weighted MR imaging (DW-MRI). Besides these modalities dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound (D-CEUS) is a new modality used for tissue characterization and therapy response assessment in several tumor locations, like liver tumors and breast cancer. D-CEUS reflect tissue vascular perfusion. For rectal cancer, the value of D-CEUS for pathological response prediction and assessment has never been assessed. Therefore, in this study we assessed D-CEUS to predict and assess pathological response in rectal cancer after neo-adjuvant CRT.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
2
Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound (D-CEUS) with Sonovue® administration
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
Area under the echo-power curve (AUC)
Time frame: At inclusion, 3 months and 6 months visits
Peak enhancement (PE)
Time frame: At inclusion, 3 months and 6 months visits
Rise time (RT)
Time frame: At inclusion, 3 months and 6 months visits
Wash-in area under the curve (WiAUC)
Time frame: At inclusion, 3 months and 6 months visits
Mean transit time (mTT)
Time frame: At inclusion, 3 months and 6 months visits
Time to peak (TTP)
Time frame: At inclusion, 3 months and 6 months visits
Whash-in rate (WiR)
Time frame: At inclusion, 3 months and 6 months visits
Wash out rate (WoR)
Time frame: At inclusion, 3 months and 6 months visits
MRI assessed Tumor Response Grade (mrTRG)
Time frame: At inclusion, 3 months and 6 months visits
mrTNM staging
Time frame: At inclusion, 3 months and 6 months visits
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.