This study addresses, whether treatment with IV iron for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and iron deficiency (ID), both with or without anaemia, can improve exercise capacity as measured by 6-minute walking test (6-MWT) and symptoms while being safe
All previous trials have excluded patients with HFpEF. This study addresses, whether treatment with IV iron for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and iron deficiency (ID), both with or without anaemia, can improve exercise capacity as measured by 6-minute walking test (6-MWT) and symptoms while being safe. The FAIR-HFpEF study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of Ferinject® in improving symptoms of HFpEF in patients with ID. Analyses will focus both on subjective and objective measures as well as on patients with and without anaemia. Furthermore, the tolerability and safety of Ferinject® treatment will be evaluated.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
40
After baseline assessments patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive Ferric Carboxymaltose IV or placebo/saline (normal saline: 0.9% w/v NaCl). In the Treatment group, Ferric Carboxymaltose will be administered according to the dosing schedule.
In the placebo/saline group, patients will receive the aequivalent number of normal saline infusions.
Innere Medizin/Kardiologie
Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany
University Medical Center Göttingen
Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany
Saarland University Medical Center
Homburg, Saarland, Germany
Herzzentrum Dresden GmbH
Dresden, Saxony, Germany
exercise capacity
The difference of 6-minute walking distance in meters from baseline to week 24 in symptomatic patients with HFpEF with documented ID compared to the control group.
Time frame: 24 weeks
6min-walking distance
Difference in 6-minute walking distance in meters from baseline to end of study in symptomatic patients with HFpEF with documented ID compared to the control group
Time frame: 52 weeks
Patient Global Assessment (PGA)
Difference in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) in symptomatic patients with HFpEF with documented ID from baseline to end of study. (7-point Likert scale \[non-parametric\])
Time frame: 52 weeks
NYHA functional class
Difference in NYHA class from baseline to end of study in symptomatic patients with HFpEF
Time frame: 52 weeks
Change in quality of life assessments
Difference in quality of life assessments (EQ-5D (= European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version; = tool for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) measurement); KCCQ (= Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire)) from baseline to end of study in symptomatic patients with HFpEF. KCCQ: (0-100) -\> 100=best EQ-5D (5-point Likert scale, 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, anxiety) 5 levels (1 = no problems level 5 = extreme problems))
Time frame: 52 weeks
Rate of recurrent heart failure hospitalisations and death
Difference in the rate of recurrent heart failure hospitalisations and deaths in symptomatic patients with HFpEF and ID.
Time frame: 52 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Charité University Medicine Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Universitäres Herzzentrum Hamburg
Hamburg, Germany
Herzklinik Ulm
Ulm, Germany