The purpose of this study is to look at the effect of strength training in preventing overuse injuries in female runners
This randomized clinical trial will compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on: (1) injury rates in female runners during the 9 month intervention period, and for 9 months after completing the intervention, and (2) on the potential mechanisms of injury including strength, joint and tissue loading, and psychosocial factors.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
150
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Incidence of Overuse Injury (Physical Exam/Injury Report Form)
To compare the effects of a 9-month strength training program to a control group on the incidence of overuse, lower extremity, running injuries in female adult recreational and competitive runners during and 9 months subsequent to the training period.
Time frame: Month 18
Lower Extremity Muscular Strength (HUMAC norm isokinetic dynamometer)
To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on lower extremity muscular strength at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention.
Time frame: Months 0, 9, and 18
Biomechanical Joint Moments (3D kinematic and kinetic data collected by 6-camera motion capture gait analysis)
To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on hip, knee, and ankle joint moments during running at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention.
Time frame: Month 0, 9, and 18
Biomechanical Joint Forces (3D kinematic and kinetic data collected by 6-camera motion capture gait analysis)
To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on knee and ankle compressive and shear bone-on-bone joint forces during running at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention.
Time frame: Month 0, 9, and 18
Biomechanical Joint Tissue Loading (3D kinematic and kinetic data collected by 6-camera motion capture gait analysis)
To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on joint tissue loading during running at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention.
Time frame: Month 0, 9, and 18
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Self-Efficacy (Adherence Self-Efficacy Questionnaire)
To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on performance self-efficacy at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention
Time frame: Months 0, 9, and 18
Quality of Life (SF-12 Health Related Quality of Life Survey)
To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on health-related quality of life at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention
Time frame: Months 0, 9, and 18
Quality of Life (Satisfaction with Life Scale)
To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on health-related quality of life at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention
Time frame: Months 0, 9, and 18
Quality of Life (Positive and Negative Affect Scale)
To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on health-related quality of life at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention
Time frame: Months 0, 9, and 18
Quality of Life (State Trait Anxiety Inventory-S Scale)
To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on health-related quality of life at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention
Time frame: Months 0, 9, and 18
Quality of Life (Visual Analog Pain Scale)
To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on health-related quality of life at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention
Time frame: Months 0, 9, and 18