SMART Africa (Strengthening Mental Health Research and Training)

Washington University School of Medicine3,117 enrolled

Overview

The objective of this research study is to examine the implementation of and outcomes associated with an evidence-based practice (EBP), specifically Multiple Family Group (MFG) targeting youth disruptive behavior challenges and success, through a scale up intervention study in Uganda, and two pilot studies that will be conducted in Kenya and Ghana.

A longitudinal experimental mixed methods effectiveness-implementation hybrid research design will be employed. The study will be conducted across thirty primary schools representing both semi-urban and rural communities. We expect to involve 3,000 youth (in primary schools grades 2 through 7; 8 to 13 years) and their adult caregivers (3,000) in Uganda, 180 youth and their caregivers (180) in Ghana, and 180 youth and their caregivers (180) in Kenya. Schools will be randomly assigned to 3 study conditions: 1) MFG-delivered by trained family peers; 2) MFG-delivered by community health workers (school health education program coordinators in Ghana); or, 3) Comparison: mental health and school support materials (e.g., books, uniforms). Data will be collected at baseline, 8 and 16 weeks, and 6 months follow-up (10 months from baseline). More specifically the objectives of this study are: Primary objectives 1. To examine short- and long-term outcomes associated with the MFG. Hypothesis: Children in the treatment groups (MFG) will improve significantly more compared to those in the comparison (usual care) group. 2. To examine how systematic variations in the delivery of an evidence-based MFG program impacts outcomes for children with behavioral difficulties and their caregivers in each country context. Hypothesis: Children who participate in MFG with their families will display significantly reduced conduct difficulties and increased functioning over time compared to those involved in comparison condition. We expect that parent peers - compared to community health workers - will evidence significantly more success engaging families to attend MFG sessions, thus, children in the MFG-parent peer delivered condition will evidence the great improvement relative to the other two study conditions. Secondary objectives 3. To compare the uptake and implementation of MFGs by trained existing family peers and community outreach health workers. Hypothesis: Given the level of training that community outreach health workers have received prior to the study as part of their regular professional training, they will evidence higher fidelity initially, yet with training and ongoing supervision, we expect these differences to decrease over time. 4. To examine multi-level (state/government, NGOs, families, schools, communities) influences on the uptake, implementation, effectiveness and sustainability of EBPs that address serious child disruptive behavioral challenges.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

3,117

Conditions

Comparison Group Multiple Family Groups by Parent Peers Multiple Family Groups by Community Health Workers

Interventions

MFGBEHAVIORAL

The MFG is a series of weekly meetings guided by a protocol.Over the course of 16 weeks, groups are held weekly and are facilitated by trained and supervised group leaders (in this case either parent peers or community health outreach workers). Groups can consist of up to 20 families involving adult caregivers and all children over six years of age in the family. The protocols have been designed to provide opportunities during each session to directly apply content to the realities of family life, emergent cultural and values perspectives, as well as tailor messages to age of child. Redundancy for missed appointments and opportunities for reinforcement is built in. We aim for families to attend at least 8 meetings or more (out of 16 sessions in total), as findings suggests this dose is needed to reduce child conduct problems and the majority of families reach this goal.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 8 YearsMax age: 99 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: \- Inclusion criteria for caregiver/child dyads: * Adult caregiver of a child in primary school, grades two through 7, ages 8 to 13 years * Adult caregiver willing to consent and available for research and intervention activities * Child between the ages 8 to 13 or in primary school (grades two through seven) who is screened for ODD or CD as measured by the Disruptive Behavior Disorder Rating Scale, Impairment Scale, and Iowa Conners Scale. * Child willing to assent. * Inclusion criteria for parent peers: * Caregivers of children who agree to be trained to provide support to families. * Inclusion criteria for community health workers * Lay paraprofessionals who work within primary care settings. * Inclusion criteria for school directors * Directors who oversee schools where the proposed intervention will have been tested. Exclusion Criteria: \- Exclusion criteria for caregiver/child dyads: * Lack of understanding of study and study procedures as determined by the research team * Child or caregiver refusal to participate * Exclusion criteria for parent peers: * Refusal to participate * Exclusion criteria for community health workers * Refusal to participate * Exclusion criteria for school directors * Refusal to participate

Locations (4)

Washington University in St. Louis

St Louis, Missouri, United States

University of Ghana

Accra, Ghana

University of Nairobi

Nairobi, Kenya

Reach the Youth Uganda

Masaka, Uganda

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Child disruptive behavior

Change in disruptive behavior will be measured by Iowa Connors

Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 6 months

Child impairment

Change in disruptive behavior will be measured Impairment scale

Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 6 months

Secondary Outcomes

Implementation and Feasibility

implementation and feasibility checklist measures

Time frame: 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 6 months

Fidelity

MFG Intervention Fidelity Assessment measures

Time frame: end of session at week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 7, week 8, week 9, week 10, week 11, week 12, week 13, week 14, week 15, week 16

Sustainability

Program Sustainability Assessment Tool

Time frame: 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 6 months

Implementation process

Metropolitan Area Child Study process measure

Time frame: 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 6 months

Parenting

Change in parenting will be measured by Alabama Parenting questionnaire

Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 6 months

Social support

Improvement in social support will be measured by Multidimensional scale of perceived social support -modified

Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 6 months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.