Amputation injuries of the fingertip are common in all ages. For decades it is known that conservatively treated fingertips can regenerate skin and soft tissues to form a functionally and cosmetically excellent new fingertip. Unfortunately, little is known about the mechanisms controlling this ability that, in humans, is confined to the fingertips. Even less is known about the bacteria that regularly colonize these wounds without noticeable negative impact on regeneration and healing. Medical evidence on fingertip regeneration in humans is largely limited to retrospective studies and case reports. This study will be the first randomized controlled trial on the conservative treatment of fingertip amputations in children and adults. When managed without surgery, self-adhesive polyurethane film dressings are commonly used to establish a wet chamber around the injury. This provides the best conditions for tissue regeneration inhibiting the formation of scar tissue at the same time. Unfortunately these dressings do not offer mechanical protection, they do not stick to wet skin and leak malodorous wound fluid. The investigators therefore developed a silicone finger cap that deals with these problems offering a mechanically protected, wet chamber around the injury for optimal regeneration conditions. This finger cap also offers a puncturable reservoir for excess wound fluid, which by this route can be routinely analyzed for diagnostic and research purposes. This randomized controlled trial will for the first time test acceptance, safety and efficacy of this novel medical device in comparison with conventional self-adhesive film dressings while gathering information on the clinical course and outcome of conservatively treated fingertip amputation injuries. Based on sample size calculations for primary outcome, 22 patients older than 2 years will be enrolled within 24 hours after having suffered an injury distal to the distal interphalangeal joint comprising all layers of the skin with a substance defect that cannot be primarily adapted without further shortening of the finger or plastic surgery. Participants are randomly assigned to start their treatment for the first two weeks either with a conventional film dressing or with the novel silicone finger cap. They will be changed to the other modality for another two weeks before the patient or the guardian can decide, if they would want the film dressing or the finger cap for the rest of the treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
22
Treatment with silicone finger cap
Treatment with conventional film dressing
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus
Dresden, Saxony, Germany
Acceptance
Acceptance of the silicone finger cap in comparison with conventional film dressings. Patient decides which dressing he or she prefers for the remaining treatment.
Time frame: At day 28 after injury
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability)
Safety of the finger cap in comparison to the film dressing. Patients are asked for adverse events (AE) or serious adverse events (SAE).
Time frame: At Day 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42 resp. till wound healing is complete.
Disease-specific quality of life
Determination of disease-specific quality of life during the treatment with the silicon finger cap in comparison to the film dressing using a modified quality of life Wuerzburg Wound Score
Time frame: At Day 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42 and 4 months resp. till wound healing is complete.
Unplanned dressing changes as measured by number of dressing changes in addition to number of visits according to study protocol.
Necessity of unplanned dressing changes in comparison to the film dressing.
Time frame: Up to 42 days resp. till wound healing is complete.
Microbiological colonization
Changes in microbiological colonization in the wound during treatment using microbiological analysis.
Time frame: At Day 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42 resp. till wound healing is complete (if wound fluid is aspirable).
Re-epithelialization rate
Measuring of re-epithelialization rate
Time frame: At Day 14, 28, 42 resp. till wound healing is complete.
Tissue growth
Determination of tissue growth during treatment using medical ultrasound
Time frame: At day 28 and 4 months.
Function of the regenerated perspiratory glands
Ceck of function of the regenerated perspiratory glands using Moberg's Ninhydrin test.
Time frame: At 4 months (Day 122).
Sensibility/Sensitivity of the injured fingertip
Check of sensibility/sensitivity of the injured fingertip using 2-point-discrimination threshold in the area of the injury is checked in comparison to the corresponding finger of the contralateral hand
Time frame: At 4 months (Day 122).
Cosmetic aspects, measured using a check list/questionnaire
Checking a list of common deformities i.e. scarring, split nails.
Time frame: At 4 months (Day 122).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.