The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare implant kinematics of conventional mechanically aligned and anatomically aligned total knee arthroplasties (TKA) at 1 year post-operatively.
Participants will be randomized to receive a primary TKA using either an anatomic alignment or a conventional mechanical alignment technique. Participants will undergo a kinematic analysis of a deep knee bend using single-plane fluoroscopy at 1 year post-operatively. The primary outcome will be based on the 6 degree of freedom kinematics and associated joint component proximity during the knee bend task. Secondary outcomes include the Knee Society Score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and the Forgotten Knee Score.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE
A standard midvastus approach will be used for both alignment technique groups. This is a standard approach for exposing the knee joint for TKA.
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Knee motion, as determined by 6 degree freedom of movement kinematics and associated joint proximity during the knee bend task.
Time frame: 1 year post surgery
Participants perception of knee function, as determined by the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time frame: 1 year post surgery
Participant's awareness of the joint implant, as determined by the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)
Time frame: 1 year post surgery
Knee joint and ambulatory function based on physical exam, as determined by the Knee Society Score (KSS)
Time frame: 1 year post surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.