Effect of Multisensory Stimulation on Upper Extremity Motor Recovery in Stroke Patient: a Preliminary Testing

Tung Wah College12 enrolled

Overview

Despite the advances in stroke rehabilitation, post-stroke upper extremity impairment is still a major challenge. Increasing evidence can be found supporting stimulation of the afferent receptor enhances neuroplasticity in the brain. Studies have suggested multisensory stimulation could promote motor learning by re-establishing the disrupted sensorimotor loop due to stroke and enhance neuroplasticity. The objective of the study was to examine the effect of multisensory stimulation on upper-extremity motor recovery and self-care function in stroke patients.

Stroke patients referred to occupational therapy division of geriatric day hospital will be recruited and randomly assigned to a multisensory therapy group or a conventional training group. The Multisensory therapy group received 12 weeks (two sessions/ week; 90 minutes/session) training. Each session began with 15 minutes of sensory stimulation (cold and vibration), 45 minutes of motor training and 30 minutes of self-care training. The conventional training group included 12 weeks (two sessions/ week; 90 minutes/session) training. Each session included 60 minutes of upper extremity motor practice and 30 minutes of self-care training. Outcome measures included: Brunnstrom's stage, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale and Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity were used for upper limb motor control and function; and Manual muscle testing was used for muscle strength. The modified Barthel Index was used for self-care performance

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

NON_RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Multisensory therapyOTHER

Sensory stimulation, motor training and ADL training

Conventional trainingOTHER

Motor training and ADL training

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 50 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion criteria: * First-time ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke; * Stroke onset \> 4 weeks and \< 6 months * Single lesion * Upper extremity motor deficit * No severe cognitive impairment and able to follow verbal instructions. Exclusion Criteria: * Skin conditions/ injuries over the stimulation application areas * Contraindication for cold or vibration application * Speech disorder or global aphasia * Musculoskeletal or cardiac disorders * Other neurological conditions * History of diabetes or sensory impairment attributable to peripheral vascular disease or neuropathy

Locations (1)

Wong Tai Sin Hospital

Wong Tai Sin, Hong Kong

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change from baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery at 3 months

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment was used to assess the progress in synergistic and voluntary movement at baseline and post intervention.

Time frame: Baseline and post intervention at week 12

Change from baseline Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity at 3 months

The Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity was used to evaluate the recovery of the hemiplegic upper extremity functions at baseline and post intervention.

Time frame: Baseline and post intervention at week 12

Secondary Outcomes

Change from baseline Modified Barthel Index at 3 months

The Modified Barthel Index was used to measure functional performance in basic activities of daily living at baseline and post intervention.

Time frame: Baseline and post intervention at week 12

Change from baseline Manual Muscle testing at 3 months

Manual muscle testing (MMT) was used for the evaluation of the motor recovery and strength of upper extremity muscle groups at baseline and post intervention.

Time frame: Baseline and post intervention at week 12

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.