Detection of growth restricted fetuses relies primarily on abdominal ultrasound examinations during pregnancy. Many clinicians, however, have not received systematic training and may therefore perform inadequately. We wish to examine, whether systematic, simulation-based training can improve diagnostic accuracy of estimated fetal weight by ultrasound at different levels of clinical experience.
Participants are physicians working at obstetric departments. Participant characteristics (age, experience in years and number of monthly scans) are recorded. Participants perform two abdominal growth scans prior to randomization and estimated fetal weight is compared to birth weight. Mean absolute percentage error is calculated as a measure of diagnostic accuracy. Participants are then randomized to either control (no intervention) or intervention. The latter group receives training on the Metaphor Scantrainer trans abdominal ultrasound simulator until they pass a previously validated test. After completing the training the participants use a mannikin to practice systematic approach and 'knobology'. All participants then perform another two growth scans. Diagnostic accuracy before and after the intervention or control period is compared. We wish to examine the effect of systematic training on the diagnostic accuracy of estimated fetal weight by ultrasound across different levels of clinical experience. If an effect can be found in the inexperienced participants, simulation-based training in obstetric ultrasound could be implemented as a part of basic obstetric training and/or as a means of maintaining skills.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
70
As described under group descriptions
Copenhagen University Hospital
Copenhagen, Denmark
Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hillerød Hospital
Hillerød, Denmark
Diagnostic accuracy of estimated fetal weight by ultrasound.
percentage error of fell weight estimate compared to actual fetal weight
Time frame: 1 month
Ratings of ultrasound images
Images are rated using the image-scoring method by Salomon et al. (Salomon et al. Feasibility and reproducibility of an image-scoring method for quality control of fetal biometry in the second trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27;34-40) The images are scores on the number of landmarks, correct caliper placement and image optimization. A minimum of 0 and a maximum of 16 points can be given (best possible score).
Time frame: 1 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.