End-stage heart failure (ESHF) represents a major burden in terms of quality of life, mortality and costs. The current practice in France is to treat patients with ESHF by a combination of drugs and lifestyle interventions before proposing heart transplant (HT) if there is no contraindication. In the Heart and Diabetes Center of Bad Oyenhausen (BO) in Germany, patients presenting with ESHF are preferentially managed by ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy. The primary purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of these two strategies in the management of ESHF and associated consumption of resources.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
224
Survival
The primary outcome was comparison of survival at two years between the two treatment strategies
Time frame: two years
Resource consumption
One secondary outcomes was comparison of the treatment strategies up to two years of follow-up about resource consumption.
Time frame: Two years
Costs
One secondary outcomes was comparison of the treatment strategies up to two years of follow-up about costs.
Time frame: Two years
Costs versus survival
One secondary outcomes was comparison of the treatment strategies up to two years of follow-up about costs versus survival.
Time frame: Two years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.