The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the incidence of adverse events associated with removal of the LMA either in deeply anesthetised or awake patients.
Written informed consent was obtained from parents for this prospective, randomized study conducted on children scheduled for minor surgery. Anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane, supplemented with propofol (3mg/kg) then maintained with nitrous oxide and sevoflurane 2-4% in oxygen. Analgesia was insured by peripheral nerve blocks. Included children were randomized into 2 groups: * Awake: the LMA was left in place until the patient fully regained consciousness * Deeply anesthetised: the LMA was immediately removed once the halogenated anesthetic turned off, and ventilation using facial mask was carried until spontaneous ventilation recovery. Respiratory complications that occurred during LMA removal until 20 minutes afterwards were recorded. Children with respiratory history and those for whom peripheral nerve blocks failed, were excluded.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
148
According to randomization, LMA device was removed at the end of surgery, either in deeply anesthetised patients or after consciousness recovery.
Hôpital d'Enfants Béchir Hamza
Bab Saadoun, Tunis Governorate, Tunisia
Occurence of respiratory adverse events
Time frame: from LMA removal to 20 minutes afterwards
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.