This was a multicenter, randomized study to evaluate the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of VRC-ZKADNA090-00-VP (Zika virus wildtype DNA vaccine) or placebo. In Part A, the primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the vaccine in different vaccination regimens. In Part B, the primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the vaccine compared to placebo.
This was a multicenter, randomized study to evaluate safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a 3-dose vaccination regimen with the Zika virus wildtype (ZIKVwt) DNA vaccine (VRC-ZKADNA090-00-VP) or placebo (VRC-PBSPLA043-00-VP). The placebo was a sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The hypotheses were that the ZIKVwt DNA vaccine would be safe and would elicit a ZIKV-specific immune response. Participants received study product intramuscularly (IM) in the limbs as specified by the group assignment by PharmaJet needle-free device. In Part A, 90 participants were randomized to vaccine at a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a 4 mg dose split between 2 injections, 4 mg dose split between 4 injections or 8 mg dose split between 4 injections. In Part B, 2338 participants were randomized to vaccine or placebo in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 4 mg (1 mL) dose of vaccine or 1 mL of placebo split between 2 injections. The vaccine dose and administration plan for Part B was selected based on Part A and Phase 1 data. Vaccine safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring of clinical and laboratory parameters throughout the study. Solicited reactogenicity symptoms were collected for 7 days after each product administration. The study schedule included clinic visits with safety and immunogenicity blood samples collected at particular time points. Vaccine efficacy was evaluated in Part B by comparing incidence of virologic ZIKV cases between vaccine and placebo groups. During the study, when participants exhibited any possible symptom of ZIKV infection, they were evaluated by blood and urine ZIKV polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Stored blood samples were also assessed retrospectively by ZIKV PCR to identify possible asymptomatic cases. A Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) oversaw the study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
2,428
VRC-ZKADNA090-00-VP is composed of a single closed-circular DNA plasmid (VRC 5283) that encodes with wild type (wt) precursor transmembrane M (prM) and envelope (E) proteins from the H/PF/2013 strain of ZIKV
A sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) prepared for human administration as a placebo
QPS-Miami Research Associates
Miami, Florida, United States
Doctors Hospital at Renaissance
Edinburg, Texas, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
Hospital Das Clinicas Da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Centro de Pesquisas Clínicas Do Instituto Central Do Hospital Das Clínicas Da FMUSP
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Clinica de la Costa Ltda
Barranquilla, Atlántico, Colombia
Centro de Atencion y Diagnostico de Enfermedades Infecciosas
Bucaramanga, Santander Department, Colombia
CCIM Costa Rican Center Center of Medical Research, Sociedad Anonima
San José, Los Yoses, Costa Rica
AGA Clinical Centro de Investigaciones
Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador
Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
...and 7 more locations
Number of Participants Reporting Local Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms for 7 Days After Each Product Administration (Part A and Part B)
Participants recorded the occurrence of solicited symptoms on a diary card for 7 days after each study product administration and reviewed the diary card with clinic staff at a follow up visit. Participants were counted once for each symptom at the worst severity if they indicated experiencing the symptom more than one time at any severity during the reporting period. The number reported for "Any Local Symptom" is the number of participants reporting any local symptom at the worst severity. Reactogenicity grading (Mild, Moderate, Severe) was done using the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials (FDA Guidance - September 2007).
Time frame: 7 days after each product administration
Number of Participants Reporting Systemic Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms for 7 Days After Each Product Administration (Part A and Part B)
Participants recorded the occurrence of solicited symptoms on a diary card for 7 days after each study product administration and reviewed the diary card with clinic staff at a follow up visit. Participants were counted once for each symptom at the worst severity if they indicated experiencing the symptom more than once at any severity during the reporting period. The number reported for "Any Systemic Symptom" is the number of participants reporting any systemic symptom at the worst severity. Reactogenicity grading (Mild, Moderate, Severe) was done using the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials (FDA Guidance - September 2007).
Time frame: 7 days after each product administration
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Measures of Safety (Part A)
Any abnormal laboratory results recorded as unsolicited AEs are summarized. Safety laboratory parameters included: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), platelets, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils. Laboratory safety evaluations were scheduled at baseline and weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16. Institutional laboratory normals as well as the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventative Vaccine Clinical Trials FDA Guidance, September 2007 were used.
Time frame: Day 0 after first product administration through Day 112
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Measures of Safety (Part B)
Any abnormal laboratory results recorded as unsolicited AEs are summarized. Safety laboratory parameters included: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), platelets, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils. Laboratory safety evaluations were scheduled at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 16, and 44. Institutional laboratory normals as well as the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventative Vaccine Clinical Trials FDA Guidance, September 2007 were used.
Time frame: Day 0 after first product administration through Day 308
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Following Product Administration (Part A)
Any SAEs recorded from receipt of first study product administration through the last expected study visit at Day 224 are summarized. The relationship between a SAE and the study product was assessed by the investigator on the basis of his or her clinical judgment and the definitions outlined in the protocol.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 224
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Following Product Administration (Part B)
Any SAEs recorded from receipt of first study product administration through the last expected study visit at Day 672 are summarized. The relationship between a SAE and the study product was assessed by the investigator on the basis of his or her clinical judgment and the definitions outlined in the protocol.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 672
Number of Participants With New Chronic Medical Conditions Following Product Administration (Part A)
New onset chronic medical conditions were reported from receipt of first study product administration through the last expected study visit at Day 224.The relationship between a chronic medical condition and the study product was assessed by the investigator on the basis of his or her clinical judgment and the definitions outlined in the protocol.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 224
Number of Participants With New Chronic Medical Conditions Following Product Administration (Part B)
New onset chronic medical conditions were reported from receipt of first study product administration through the last expected study visit at Day 672.The relationship between a chronic medical condition and the study product was assessed by the investigator on the basis of his or her clinical judgment and the definitions outlined in the protocol.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 672
Number of Participants With One or More Unsolicited Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) Following Product Administration (Part A and Part B)
Unsolicited AEs and attribution assessments were recorded in the study database from receipt of the first study product administration through the one month visit that followed the last study product administration (Visit 05), 84 days for both Parts A and B for participants who received all three study product administrations. If a participant received the first and second product administrations but not the third, then the time frame was through 56 days (Visit 04). If a participant only received the first product administration but not the second or third, then the time frame was through 28 days (Visit 03). The relationship between an AE and the study product was assessed by the investigator on the basis of his or her clinical judgment and the definitions outlined in the protocol. A participant with multiple experiences of the same event is counted once using the event of worst severity.
Time frame: Day 0 through the one month visit that follows the last product administration (Visit 05), 84 days for both Parts A and B
Number of Participants With Virologically Confirmed Cases of ZIKV (Part B Only)
Virologically confirmed Zika infection, irrespective of symptoms, by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in blood or in urine were recorded from receipt of first study product administration through the last expected study visit.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 672
Zika Antigen-specific Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) - (Part A)
Antibody response as measured by ZIKV neutralization antibody (NAb) assay. Neutralizing activity is reported as the dilution of sera required to neutralize eighty percent of infection events (EC80).
Time frame: Day 0 to 28 days after the third product administration
Number of Participants With Positive Response to Zika Antigen-specific Neutralizing Antibody (Part A)
A participant was a responder or met the threshold of a positive response if the post vaccination anti-ZIKV antibody titer was 30 or greater.
Time frame: Day 0 to 28 days after the third product administration
Number of Participants With Subclinical Cases of ZIKV (Part B Only)
Virologically confirmed cases of Zika infection without clinical signs or symptoms were recorded from receipt of first study product administration through the last expected study visit by PCR virus detection in blood of participants at regularly defined intervals. Subclinical cases of ZIKV infection were identified by retrospective PCR.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 672
Zika Antigen-specific Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) - (Part B)
Antibody response as measured by ZIKV neutralization antibody (NAb) assay. Neutralizing activity is reported as the dilution of sera required to neutralize fifty percent of infection events (EC50).
Time frame: Day 0 to 28 days after the third product administration
Number of Participants With Positive Response to Zika Antigen-specific Neutralizing Antibody (Part B)
A participant is a responder or met the threshold of a positive response if the post vaccination anti-ZIKV antibody titer was 30 or greater.
Time frame: Day 0 to 28 days after the third product administration
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.