This is a multi-center, prospective, single-blinded, two-arm study, randomized to include approximately 134 subjects treated with Subchondroplasty (SCP) + Arthroscopy and 67 subjects with arthroscopy alone. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate superiority of Subchondroplasty with arthroscopy compared to arthroscopy alone for treatment of Bone Marrow Lesions (BMLs) in the knee.
This is a multicenter, prospective, single-blinded, two-arm, randomized study. Enrolled subjects will have a single Bone Marrow Lesion of the tibia, single BML of the femur, or adjoining Bone Marrow Lesions of tibia and femur. Subjects will also be surgical candidates for knee arthroscopy due to mechanical symptoms, meniscus tear, loose body and/or synovitis. A stratified blocked randomization will be used to assign subjects to either Subchondroplasty with arthroscopy or to arthroscopy alone in a 2:1 ratio. Individual sets of blocks will be determined within study site and lesion polarity status (unipolar vs. bipolar). Subjects will be enrolled within 60 days prior to surgery and take part in follow-up visits for two years following surgery. A preoperative visit will occur at the time of enrollment. Follow-up visits were to initially occur at the study site at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery. Telephone follow-up interviews to be be performed at 9 and 18 months post-surgery. Target enrollment was 201 subjects, to include 134 subjects in the treatment group (Subchondroplasty + Arthroscopy) and 67 subjects in the control group (Arthroscopy alone). As of October 2020, follow-up has been amended to be completed remotely, where all visits can be performed electronically and/or via telephone. Subjects will complete the study at the 24 month follow-up visit. For the purposes of this protocol, a revision will be defined as any partial or total joint arthroplasty or any bone fixation, bone grafting or bone substitute procedure in the same compartment in the study knee.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
131
The Subchondroplasty® (SCP®) Procedure targets and fills bone defects with AccuFill® Bone Substitute Material utilizing an arthroscopic / percutaneous approach. Using intraoperative fluoroscopy, the bone defect is localized relative to MRI findings The appropriate AccuPort® Delivery Cannula is drilled to the bone defect. AccuFill® Bone Substitute Material is then injected into the subchondral bone defect. The calcium phosphate (CaP) fills the edematous void and hardens within the Bone Marrow Lesion. The CaP is resorbed over time and replaced with new bone during the healing process.
An endoscopic examination, therapy and surgery of the knee joint.
CORE Orthopaedic Medical Center
Encinitas, California, United States
Loma Linda University Health System
Loma Linda, California, United States
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States
Composite Clinical Success
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether Subchondroplasty with arthroscopy is superior to arthroscopy alone for treatment of bone marrow lesions in the knee. Superiority will be evaluated in terms of Composite Clinical Success (CCS) requiring freedom from subsequent secondary surgical intervention (SSSI) and among those free from SSSI, a clinically meaningful reduction in self-reported pain based on a validated measure of subject-reported pain (improvement in KOOS (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) pain of at least 10 points at 12 months). For the purpose of this study, SSSI will include any partial or total joint arthroplasty or any bone grafting or bone substitute procedure in the study knee.
Time frame: Superiority will be statistically tested at month 12 at p<0.01
Change From Baseline KOOS Subscale Scores at 12 Months
Comparison of mean change in KOOS subscale scores (Pain, Activities of Daily Living), Symptoms, Sports and Recreation, Quality of Life). Each subscale is scored from 0 to 100 on a worst to best scale.
Time frame: 12 months post-surgery
Change From Baseline Numeric Pain Score at 12 Months
Comparison of mean Numeric Pain Score (NPS). The NPS is scored from 0 to 10 where 0 indicates no pain; 5 indicates moderate pain; and 10 indicates the worst pain.
Time frame: 12 months post-surgery
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Index Score at 12 Months
Comparison of mean EQ-5D Index score
Time frame: 12 months post-surgery
Global Satisfaction Score at 6-Weeks
Patient satisfaction with knee procedure rated on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = totally dissatisfied and 10 = extremely satisfied.
Time frame: 6-weeks post-surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education
Tampa, Florida, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
MedStar Health Research Institute
Timonium, Maryland, United States
New Mexico Orthopaedic Fellowship Foundation
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Hawkins Foundation
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
...and 3 more locations
Change From Baseline KOOS Subscale Scores at 24 Months
Comparison of mean change in KOOS subscale scores (Pain, Activities of Daily Living), Symptoms, Sports and Recreation, Quality of Life). Each subscale is scored from 0 to 100 on a worst to best scale.
Time frame: 24 months post-surgery
Change From Baseline Numeric Pain Score at 24 Months
Comparison of mean Numeric Pain Score (NPS). The NPS is scored from 0 to 10 where 0 indicates no pain; 5 indicates moderate pain; and 10 indicates the worst pain.
Time frame: 24 months post-surgery
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Overall Health Score at 12 Months
Comparison of mean EQ-5D Overall Health score using the EQ Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Time frame: 12 months post-surgery
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Overall Health Score at 24 Months
Comparison of mean EQ-5D Overall Health score using the EQ Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Time frame: 24 months post-surgery
Global Satisfaction Score at 3 Months
Patient satisfaction with knee procedure rated on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = totally dissatisfied and 10 = extremely satisfied.
Time frame: 3 Months post-surgery
Global Satisfaction Score at 6 Months
Patient satisfaction with knee procedure rated on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = totally dissatisfied and 10 = extremely satisfied.
Time frame: 6 months post-surgery
Global Satisfaction Score at 12 Months
Patient satisfaction with knee procedure rated on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = totally dissatisfied and 10 = extremely satisfied.
Time frame: 12 months post-surgery
Global Satisfaction Score at 24 Months
Patient satisfaction with knee procedure rated on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = totally dissatisfied and 10 = extremely satisfied.
Time frame: 24 months post-surgery