The study will compare the impact of Child STEPs versus usual school-based therapy on neural and companion behavioral measures of self-regulation.
This project will implement and evaluate the Child STEPs treatment approach as compared to "treatment as usual" (known as Usual Care or UC) through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) at eight K-8 public schools. The STEPs model has two components: (1) a modular protocol that combines 33 modules-i.e., descriptions of common elements within evidence-based therapies for anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and conduct problems; and (2) a web-based system for monitoring student responses to treatment and providing weekly feedback to therapists to guide their selection and sequencing of the STEPs modules. The project will examine: (a) whether self-regulation skills at baseline are associated with baseline patterns of mental health and school problems; (b) whether self-regulation skills at baseline predict degree of improvement during treatment; (c) whether self-regulation skills improve from pre-to post treatment, and whether extent of this improvement differs by treatment condition; and (d) whether self-regulation improvement (from pre-to-post treatment) mediates the long-term benefit of treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
100
MATCH-ADTC is designed for children aged 6-15. Unlike most evidence-based treatments (EBTs), which focus on single disorder categories (e.g., anxiety only), MATCH is designed for multiple disorders and problems encompassing anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and disruptive conduct, including the conduct problems associated with ADHD. MATCH is composed of 33 modules-i.e., specific treatment procedures derived from decades of research on EBTs. The various modules can be organized and sequenced flexibly to tailor treatment to each child's characteristics and needs.
For each child, the web-based MFS system provides weekly monitoring of the MATCH modules used and the child's treatment response, in two forms (a) changes on the Behavior and Emotions Survey and (b) changes in severity of the top treatment concerns identified by youths and caregivers. At the end of treatment, the MFS provides a complete record of modules used, and child treatment response, across all the weeks of treatment.
Harvard University
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Change from Baseline Emotion Regulation Task at End of Treatment
Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to end of treatment, assessed up to 40 weeks
Change from Baseline Emotional Go/No-Go Task at End of Treatment
Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to end of treatment, assessed up to 40 weeks
Change from Baseline Attentional Bias Task at End of Treatment
Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to end of treatment, assessed up to 40 weeks
Change from Baseline Granularity Task at End of Treatment
Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to end of treatment, assessed up to 40 weeks
Change from Baseline Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) at End of Treatment
Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to end of treatment, assessed up to 40 weeks
Change from Baseline Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire Revised (EATQ-R) at End of Treatment
Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to end of treatment, assessed up to 40 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Treatment in the UC condition will use the procedures therapists and their supervisors consider appropriate and believe to be effective.