Study of ACE-083 in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

Phase 2TerminatedNCT03124459

Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA63 enrolled

Overview

This is a multicenter, phase 2 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ACE-083 in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1 and Type X (CMT1 and CMTX), to be conducted in two parts. Part 1 is non-randomized, open-label, dose-escalation and Part 2 is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled.

Part 1 (non-randomized, open-label, dose-escalation) Part 1 will consist of up to 3 cohorts of 6 patients each and will evaluate multiple ascending dose levels of ACE-083 administered bilaterally once every 3 weeks for up to 5 doses in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle. Patients in each cohort will be enrolled in a 4-week screening period before beginning treatment. Part 2 (randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled) Prior to the initiation of Part 2, a review of safety and efficacy data from Part 1 will be conducted by the Safety Review Team (SRT) to determine the recommended dose level (maximum 250 mg/muscle). A total of up to 40 new patients may be enrolled and randomized (1:1 randomization) to receive either ACE 083 (n=20) or placebo (n=20) bilaterally by injection into both TA muscles once every 3 weeks for up to 17 doses. Study duration for Parts 1 and 2 for each patient will be approximately 24 weeks, including a 4-week screening period, a 12-week treatment period, and an 8-week follow-up period after the last dose. Study duration for Part 2 will be 15 months, including 4-week screening, 6 months double blind placebo-controlled, 6 months open-label and 8 week follow-up.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

QUADRUPLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

Interventions

ACE-083DRUG

Part 1 - Recombinant fusion protein. Part 2 - Recombinant fusion protein or buffer solution.

PlaceboDRUG

Recombinant fusion protein or buffer solution

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Key Inclusion Criteria 1. Age ≥ 18 years 2. Diagnosis of CMT1 or CMTX confirmed by: 1. Clinical presentation and electrodiagnostics 2. Genetically-confirmed CMT1 or CMTX for the patient or first-degree relative 3. Part 1: 1. Six-minute walk distance (6MWD) of at least 150 meters (without a brace or walker) 2. Independent ambulation for at least 10 meters, without a brace 3. Left and right ankle plantar flexion MRC grade 4+ to 5, inclusive Part 2: 1. 6MWD ≥ 150 and ≤ 500 meters (without a brace or walker); a maximum of 20% of enrolled patients with 6MWD ≥ 450 meters will be included 2. Left and right ankle plantar flexion MRC grade 4- to 5, inclusive 4. Left and right ankle dorsiflexion Medical Research Council (MRC) manual muscle testing (MMT) grade 3 to 4+ inclusive. No more than 12 of the 40 subjects may have a grade of 3 or 3+ on one or both sides. 5. Females of childbearing potential must have negative urine pregnancy test prior to enrollment and use highly effective birth control methods during study participation and for 8 weeks following the last dose of ACE-083. Males must agree to use a condom during any sexual contact with females of childbearing potential while participating in the study and for 8 weeks following the last dose of ACE-083, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy. 6. Ability to adhere to the study visit schedule/procedures, and to understand and comply with protocol requirements 7. Signed written informed consent Key Exclusion Criteria 1. History of active malignancy, with the exception of fully excised or treated basal cell carcinoma, cervical carcinoma in-situ, or ≤ 2 squamous cell carcinomas of the skin 2. Symptomatic cardiopulmonary disease, significant functional impairment, significant orthopedic or neuropathic pain, or other co morbidities that in the opinion of the investigator would limit a patient's ability to complete strength and/or functional assessments on study 3. Type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus 4. Thyroid disorder unless condition is stable with no change in treatment for at least 4 weeks before the first dose and no expected change for duration of study 5. Renal impairment (serum creatinine ≥ 2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN\]) 6. Aspartate transaminase (AST) and/or alanine transaminase (ALT) ≥ 3 times ULN 7. Increased risk of bleeding (i.e., due to hemophilia, platelet disorders, or use of any anticoagulation/platelet modifying therapies up to 2 weeks prior to Study Day 1 and for duration of study; low dose aspirin \[≤ 100 mg daily\] is permitted) 8. Severe deformity or ankle fixation that would sufficiently limit passive range of motion to affect assessment of dorsiflexion strength 9. Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1 10. Chronic pharmacologic doses of systemic corticosteroids (≥ 2 weeks) within 4 weeks before Study Day 1 and for duration of study; intra-articular/topical/inhaled/intranasal physiologic doses of systemic corticosteroids are permitted 11. Androgens, growth hormone, insulin or oral hormone replacement therapy within 6 months before Study Day 1 and for duration of study; topical physiologic androgen replacement is permitted 12. Any change in medications potentially affecting muscle strength or function within 4 weeks of Study Day 1 and for duration of study (e.g., creatinine, CoQ10, systemic beta-adrenergic agonists) 13. Previous exposure to any investigational agent potentially affecting muscle volume, muscle strength, or muscle or nerve function within 5 half-lives of last dose plus an additional 8-week washout period (or 12 weeks prior to Study Day 1 if half-life is unknown) 14. Any previous or current exposure to ACE-083 15. Significant change in physical activity or exercise (e.g., significant increase or decrease in intensity or frequency) within 8 weeks before Study Day 1 or inability to maintain the baseline level of physical activity throughout the study 16. Any condition that would prevent MRI scanning or compromise the ability to obtain a clear and interpretable scan of the lower leg, as applicable (e.g., knee/hip replacement metallic implants) 17. Known active substance abuse, including alcohol 18. History of sensitivity to protein pharmaceuticals 19. Female that is lactating/breast-feeding

Locations (16)

University of California-Irvine

Orange, California, United States

University of Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Part 1: Frequency of Adverse Events

Number of subjects with at least one adverse event related to treatment intervention from Part 1 of this study. Since this outcome measure was only pre-specified for Part 1, only data from the Part 1 participants is reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period for Part 1 (Study Day 141).

Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Volume to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.

The percent change from baseline in volume of injected muscle, by MRI compared to the Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Secondary Outcomes

Part 2: Absolute Change in Amount of Intramuscular Fat Tissue to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

The absolute change from baseline in intramuscular fat fraction of the injected muscle, by MRI compared to Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Strength to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

Percent change from baseline in strength of the injected muscle, by Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) compared to Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, United States

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

University of Kansas Medical Center - Neurology Department

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

University of Minnesota, Neurology Department

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Columbia University

New York, New York, United States

University of Rochester Medical Center, Neurology

Rochester, New York, United States

...and 6 more locations

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk/Run Time to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

The percent change from baseline in functional assessments, as measured by 10-meter walk/run time when compared to Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk Distance Assessed at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

Percent change from baseline in functional assessments, as measured by 6-minute walk distance when compared to Day 190 Assessment, is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period for the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Part 2: Change in Balance and Fall Risk at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.

Change from baseline in static and dynamic balance, as measured by the Berg Balance Scale, a 14-item scoring system to assess balance and fall risk in adults. The Berg balance scale is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. Total scores are used for reporting, with a range of 0-56, with higher scores mean a better demonstration of function. A score of 56 indicates functional balance. A score of \< 45 indicates individuals may be at greater risk of falling. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Part 2: Percent Change in Balance and Fall Risk From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

Percent change was calculated for the difference from baseline and Day 190 Assessment scores on the Berg Balance Scale. The Berg Balance Scale, is a 14-item scoring system to assess balance and fall risk in adults. The Berg balance scale is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. Total scores are used for reporting, with a range of 0-56, with higher scores mean a better demonstration of function. A score of 56 indicates functional balance. A score of \< 45 indicates individuals may be at greater risk of falling. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Part 2: Change in Clinical Examination Score From Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

Change from baseline in the Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) Examination Score, version 2 (CMTES2), a composite scoring system to assess sensory and motor impairment in subjects with CMT. The total score is a subset of the following items from the CMT neuropathy score instrument: Sensory symptoms, Motor symptoms (legs), Motor symptoms (arms), Pinprick Sensibility, Vibration, Strength (legs), and Strength (arms). Each individual item is assessed using a rating from 0 to 4 inclusive. The range of CMTES2 scores is from 0 to 28 inclusive. A higher score means a greater degree of symptom severity. The Baseline score and score on the Day 190 Assessment are reported. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Part 2: Percent Change in Clinical Examination Score in Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

Percent change was calculated for the difference in the Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) Examination Score (CMTES2) from baseline and Day 190 Assessment scores. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Part 2: Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

The absolute change from baseline in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Health Index (CMT-HI), a disease-specific, patient-reported health index score from baseline and Day 190 Assessment scores. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).