Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) represents a clinically feasible way to restore the gut microbial ecology, and has proven to be a breakthrough for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Early results in human have shown that FMT from lean donor when transplanted into subjects with metabolic syndrome resulted in a significant improvement in insulin sensitivity and an increased in intestinal microbial diversity, including a distinct increase in butyrate-producing bacterial strains. The therapy is generally well tolerated and appeared safe. No clinical studies have assessed the efficacy of FMT in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
There is a worldwide epidemic of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus continues to rise at an alarming rate. Weight loss is associated with reductions in risk of morbidity and mortality from obesity. Conventional non-pharmacological interventions based on diet and exercise showed limited long-term success in producing sustained weight loss. Although obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus may be treated by medications or by bariatric surgery, these alternatives are limited by incomplete resolution of the diseases, high cost or potential surgical-related morbidity. Further research focusing on increasing effectiveness of interventions and new ways to achieve weight loss in these individuals are needed. Recently, accumulating evidence supports a role of the enteric microbiota in the pathogenesis of obesity-related insulin resistance. Obesity is associated with changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota, and the obese microbiome appears to be more efficient in harvesting energy from the diet. Colonization of germ-free mice with an 'obese microbiota' results in a significantly greater increase in total body fat than colonization with a 'lean microbiota', suggesting gut microbiota as an additional contributing factor to the pathophysiology of obesity. Obese and lean phenotypes can also be induced in germ-free mice by transfer of fecal microbiota from human donors. These data have led to the use of microbiota therapeutics as a potential treatment for metabolic syndrome and obesity. Clinical trials are being conducted to evaluate its use for other conditions. Early results in human have shown that FMT from lean donor when transplanted into subjects with metabolic syndrome resulted in a significant improvement in insulin sensitivity and an increased in intestinal microbial diversity, including a distinct increase in butyrate-producing bacterial strains. The therapy is generally well tolerated and appeared safe. No clinical studies have assessed the efficacy of FMT in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. No clinical studies have assessed the efficacy of FMT in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A subgroup of 30 subjects will be analyzed at week 24. The difference and proportion in microbiome in different arms, microbial factors, and trans-kingdom correlation of microbial engraftment will be correlated with clinical data in an unblinded manner.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
61
FMT
Lifestyle
Sham
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Shatin, Hong Kong
Proportion of subjects with at least 20% lean-associated microbiota in recipients after FMT compared with subjects receiving lifestyle intervention alone up to week 24
Proportion of subjects with at least 20% lean-associated microbiota in recipients after FMT compared with subjects receiving lifestyle intervention alone up to week 24.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Changes in microbial composition (including bacteriome and virome), function and metabolite
Changes in microbial composition (including bacteriome and virome), function and metabolite at weeks 4, 16, 20 and 24 compared with baseline
Time frame: 4, 16, 20, 24 week
Changes in microbiome of stool (including bacteriome and virome)
Changes in microbiome of stool (including bacteriome and virome) at weeks 4, 16 and 24 compared with baseline
Time frame: 4, 16, 24 week
Difference in microbiome (including bacteriome and virome) compared between subjects in different treatment arm
Compare the difference in microbiome among different treatment arms
Time frame: 24 week and 52 week
Proportion of microbiome (including bacteriome and virome) derived from recipient, donor or both in subjects who received FMT
Proportion of microbiome (including bacteriome and virome) derived from recipient, donor or both in subjects who received FMT
Time frame: weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 52
Difference in microbiome (including bacteriome and virome) compared between subjects who have weight loss and those do not have weight loss
Difference in microbiome (including bacteriome and virome) compared between subjects who have weight loss and those do not have weight loss
Time frame: weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 52
Microbial factors (including bacteriome and virome) that are associated with percentage of body weight loss
Microbial factors (including bacteriome and virome) that are associated with percentage of body weight loss
Time frame: weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 52
Trans-kingdom correlation of microbial engraftment
Trans-kingdom correlation of microbial engraftment after FMT between bacteriome, and virome
Time frame: weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 52
Proportion of subjects with serious adverse events compared between treatment arm, especially those related to FMT
Proportion of subjects with serious adverse events compared between treatment arm, especially those related to FMT
Time frame: weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 52
Explore changes in fungome microbiota
Explore changes in fungome microbiota
Time frame: weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 52
Proportion of subjects achieving at least 10% reduction in weight compared with baseline
Proportion of subjects achieving at least 10% reduction in weight at 52 weeks
Time frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects achieving at least 10% reduction in weight compared with baseline
Proportion of subjects achieving at least 10% reduction in weight at 24 weeks
Time frame: 24 weeks
Changes in body weight to calculate body mass index (BMI) at weeks 24 and 52 compared with baseline
Compare the change in weight to calculate the BMI among different treatment arms
Time frame: 24 week and 52 week
Changes in biochemical parameters
Changes in liver biochemistry, fasting glucose, fasting lipids, fasting insulin, HbA1C at weeks 24 and 52 compared with baseline
Time frame: 24 week and 52 week
A 30% decrease in insulin resistance at weeks 24 compared with baseline
A 30% decrease in insulin resistance at weeks 24 compared with baseline
Time frame: week 24
Changes in liver stiffness to assess improvement of other metabolic disease weeks 24 compared with baseline
Changes in liver stiffness to assess improvement of other metabolic disease weeks 24 compared with baseline
Time frame: week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.