This study was designed to determine the comparison between the King Vision video laryngoscope and McGrath MAC video laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.Patients were divided into 2 groups of 40 patients each.Patients of King Vision group \[n=40\]and Macintosh group \[n=40\]were intubated using respective devices.This study is the first to search the use of King Vision video laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in difficult airway.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
80
nasal intubation using King Vision video laryngoscope Device after general anesthesia induction
nasal intubation with McGrath MAC video laryngoscope Device after general anesthesia induction
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital,Affililated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
RECRUITINGtime to intubation
from taking of the intubation device to successful intubation
Time frame: 0 min after nasal intubation
Hemodynamic changes
heart rate
Time frame: 1 min before general anesthesia induction
Hemodynamic changes
heart rate
Time frame: 1 min after general anesthesia induction
Hemodynamic changes
heart rate
Time frame: 3 min after general anesthesia induction
Hemodynamic changes
heart rate
Time frame: 5 min after general anesthesia induction
ease of intubation
VAS scores
Time frame: 5 min after nasal intubation
incidence of trauma
sore throat, hoarseness, etc
Time frame: 24hour after surgery
incidence of trauma
sore throat, hoarseness, etc
Time frame: 1hour after surgery
number of failures
intubation failure
Time frame: 5 min after nasal intubation
the degree of Cormach-Lehane
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
glottic exposure
Time frame: 5 min after nasal intubation