This Phase I/II study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the anti-tuberculosis (TB) drug delamanid (DLM) in combination with an optimized multidrug background regimen (OBR) for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in children with MDR-TB with and without HIV.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the anti-TB drug DLM in combination with OBR for MDR-TB in children with MDR-TB with and without HIV. Participants were enrolled in one of four age cohorts: 12 to less than 18 years, 6 to less than 12 years, 3 to less than 6 years, or 0 to less than 3 years. All participants were to receive DLM doses according to their age group and weight for 24 weeks. Study visits occurred at study entry; Weeks 2 and 4; every 4 weeks through Week 40; and at Weeks 48, 60, 72, and 96. Visits included physical examinations; blood, urine, and sputum collection; chest x-rays; electrocardiograms (ECGs); hearing tests; medical history reviews; adherence assessments; and acceptability questionnaires.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
37
Administered orally; dosing based on participants' weight. ≥ 40 kg: 100 mg twice daily (adult formulation); 30 to \< 40 kg: 50 mg twice daily (adult formulation); 15 to \< 30 kg: 25 mg twice daily (pediatric formulation); \< 15 kg: 15 mg twice daily (pediatric formulation)
Non-study prescribed OBR varied according to local, national, and/or international guidelines for treatment of children with MDR-TB. Administered in addition to DLM for 24 weeks.
Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Medical College (BJMC) CRS
Pune, Maharashtra, India
Sizwe CRS
Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
PHRU Matlosana CRS
Klerksdorp, North West, South Africa
Desmond Tutu TB Centre - Stellenbosch University (DTTC-SU) CRS
Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC)
Moshi, Tanzania
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of ≥ Grade 3 Severity
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1). 95% CIconfidence interval (CI) computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Time frame: Measured from entry through Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of ≥ Grade 3 Assessed by the Core Team to be at Least Possibly Related to the Study Drug
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1). 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Time frame: Measured from entry through Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Were Terminated From Study Treatment Due to a Drug-related Adverse Event
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Time frame: Measured from entry through Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Absolute Corrected QT Interval by Fridericia (QTcF) ≥ 500 Msec
Evaluation of the Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTcF was performed per protocol. ECGs conducted at these visits were performed in triplicate (if possible). Consultation with the protocol cardiologist was available and encouraged for any abnormal or equivocal ECG findings and/or questions related to cardiac toxicities and assessment. Participants were counted if they had QTcF ≥ 500 msec at any study visit from entry to Week 24. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Time frame: Entry, weeks 2, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Died Through Week 24
Death due to all causes included. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Time frame: Measured from entry through Week 24
Geometric Mean of Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-24h) DLM
PK parameter was determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model The starting population PK model was developed on data from Otsuka study 232 and 233 (1). NONMEM was used when developing the final model for the population in this study. * Developed a population PK model as part of the final PK analysis * Data used in the population PK analysis included the semi-intensive PK visit (week 0, 2 and 8) and sparse PK visits (week 4, 12, 16, 24 and 28).
Time frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Geometric Mean of Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-24h) DM-6705
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model The starting population PK model was developed on data from Otsuka study 232 and 233 (1). NONMEM was used when developing the final model for the population in this study. * Developed a population PK model as part of the final PK analysis * Data used in the population PK analysis included the semi-intensive PK visit (week 0, 2 and 8) and sparse PK visits (week 4, 12, 16, 24 and 28).
Time frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Geometric Mean of Area of Maximal Concentration (Cmax) DLM
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Time frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Geometric Mean of Area of Maximal Concentration (Cmax) DM-6705
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Time frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Time of Maximal Concentration (Tmax) DLM
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Time frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Time of Maximal Concentration (Tmax) DM-6705
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Time frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Oral Clearance (Cl/F) DLM
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Time frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Oral Clearance (Cl/F) DM-6705
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Time frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Volume of Distribution (Vd) DLM
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Time frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Volume of Distribution (Vd) DM-6705
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Time frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Mean Absorption Time (MAT) DLM
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Time frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Terminal Half-life (t1/2) DLM
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Time frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Terminal Half-life (t1/2) DM-6705
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Time frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events ≥ Grade 3 Severity
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1). A higher grade indicates worse outcome. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Time frame: Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events ≥ Grade 3 Severity Assessed by the Core Team to be at Least Possibly Related to the Study Drug
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1). A higher grade indicates worse outcome. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Time frame: Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Percentage of Participants With Absolute Corrected QT Interval by Fridericia (QTcF) ≥ 500 Msec
Evaluation of the Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTcF was performed per protocol. ECGs conducted at these visits should be performed in triplicate (if possible). Consultation with the protocol cardiologist was available and encouraged for any abnormal or equivocal ECG findings and/or questions related to cardiac toxicities and assessment. Participants were counted as having an outcome if they had QTcF ≥ 500 msec at any study visit from entry to Week 28. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Time frame: Screening, Entry, weeks 2, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and week 28
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Percentage of Participants Who Died Through Week 72 Post DLM
Death due to all causes included. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Time frame: Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events ≥ Grade 2 Severity
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1). A higher grade indicates worse outcome. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Time frame: Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events ≥ Grade 2 Severity Assessed by the Core Team to be at Least Possibly Related to the Study Drug.
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1). A higher grade indicates worse outcome. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Time frame: Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Count of Participants With Change in QTcF Interval From Baseline of Greater Than 60 ms
Evaluation of the Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTcF was performed per protocol. ECGs conducted at these visits should be performed in triplicate (if possible). Consultation with the protocol cardiologist was available and encouraged for any abnormal or equivocal ECG findings and/or questions related to cardiac toxicities and assessment. Participants were counted if they had QTcF was greater than 60 msec at any study visit from entry to Week 28.
Time frame: Entry, weeks 2, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and week 28
Percentage of Participants (Overall) With TB Treatment Outcomes
Site investigator assessment of participant TB treatment outcomes through last study visit were entered into the eCRF. Treatment outcomes in children were defined as bacteriologic cure, probable cure, death, treatment failure, TB recurrence, and loss to follow-up as per protocol.
Time frame: Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Number of Participants Who Had Permanently Discontinued Study Drug Whilst on Study Due to Intolerance or Refusal to Take Medication
Participants were assessed for tolerability of the study drug during the study by their intolerance or refusal to take the medications
Time frame: Measured from entry through Week 24
Frequency of Cumulative Responses to Taste of Study Drug in an Acceptability Assessment
Acceptability assessments were assessed by Study Staff at study visits and by Participant Caregiver whilst at home. The participants had the option of taking the study drug either as dispersible tablet or tablet formulation.
Time frame: Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Frequency of Cumulative Responses to Formulation of Study Drug in an Acceptability Assessment
Acceptability assessments were assessed by Study Staff at study visits and by Participant Caregiver whilst at home. The participants had the option of taking the study drug either as dispersible tablet or tablet formulation. At a visit, the participant could have been taking a dispersible tablet and at the next visit the same participant could have been taking a tablet formulation.
Time frame: Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Frequency of Cumulative Responses to Taste of Dispersible Tablet Doses in an Acceptability Assessment
Acceptability assessments were assessed by Study Staff at study visits and by Participant Caregiver whilst at home. Participants' dose formulations were not restrictive as at each visit, the participant was given the option of taking the study drug as either a dispersible tablet or tablet formulation. At a visit, the participant could have been taking a dispersible tablet and at the next visit the same participant could have been taking a tablet formulation.
Time frame: Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Frequency of Cumulative Responses to Administration of Dispersible Tablet Doses in an Acceptability Assessment
Acceptability assessments were assessed by Study Staff at study visits and by Participant Caregiver whilst at home. Participants' dose formulations were not restrictive as at each visit, the participant was given the option of taking the study drug as either a dispersible tablet or tablet formulation. At a visit, the participant could have been taking a dispersible tablet and at the next visit the same participant could have been taking a tablet formulation.
Time frame: Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Frequency of Cumulative Responses to Taste of Tablet Doses in an Acceptability Assessment
Acceptability assessments were assessed by Study Staff at study visits and by Participant Caregiver whilst at home. Participants' dose formulations were not restrictive as at each visit, the participant was given the option of taking the study drug as either a dispersible tablet or tablet formulation. At a visit, the participant could have been taking a dispersible tablet and at the next visit the same participant could have been taking a tablet formulation.
Time frame: Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Frequency of Cumulative Responses to Administration of Tablet Doses in an Acceptability Assessment
Acceptability assessments were assessed by Study Staff at study visits and by Participant Caregiver whilst at home. Participants' dose formulations were not restrictive as at each visit, the participant was given the option of taking the study drug as either a dispersible tablet or tablet formulation. At a visit, the participant could have been taking a dispersible tablet and at the next visit the same participant could have been taking a tablet formulation.
Time frame: Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Age Effect on Bioavailability DLM
Plasma concentrations are used to determine age effect on bioavailability. The age covariate describes the fold change in bioavailability for each respective age group of 0-1 year and 1-2 years, with participants aged \>2 to \<18 years used as the reference group. Study arms were combined for the analysis of age effect.
Time frame: Approximately Week 2
Age Effect on Fraction Metabolised From Delaminid to DM-6705
Plasma concentrations are used to determine age effect on bioavailability. The age covariate describes the fold change in bioavailability for each respective age group of 0-1 year and 1-2 years, with participants aged \>2 to \<18 years used as the reference group. Study arms were combined for the analysis of age effect.
Time frame: Approximately Week 2
Dose Effect on Bioavailability DLM
Plasma concentrations are used to determine dose effect on bioavailability. For doses \> 50 mg the bioavailability is described by F=(dose/100)-0.66. The participants receiving the dose 100 mg are the reference group and the dose effect of doses 15-20mg, 25mg and 50mg on the bioavailability are compared to the reference group and the fold change is presented. Study arms were combined for the analysis of dose effect.
Time frame: Approximately Week 2