This multicenter, observer-blind, controlled, randomized, Phase II study was designed to evaluate different formulations of the Purified Vero Rabies Cell vaccine VRVg.
This study assessed different formulations of the modified formulation of VRVg (VRVg 2- formulations 1 \[low\], 2 \[medium\] and 3 \[high\]) tested in parallel to the initial VRVg formulation (VRVg-1) and Imovax Rabies. Immune responses were assessed at Day 14, Day 28, Day 42, and at Month 7. Safety events were also reported.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
320
Modified formulation 1 (Low) of Purified Vero Rabies Vaccine Serum Free
Initial formulation of Purified Vero Rabies Vaccine Serum Free
Purified inactivated rabies vaccine prepared on human diploid cell cultures
Investigational Site
Redding, California, United States
Investigational Site
San Diego, California, United States
Investigational Site
South Miami, Florida, United States
Investigational Site
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody (RVNA) Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) Against Rabies Virus at Day 0
RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) assay method.
Time frame: Day 0
Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 14
RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method.
Time frame: Day 14
Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 28
RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method.
Time frame: Day 28
Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 42
RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method.
Time frame: Day 42
Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Month 7
RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method.
Time frame: Month 7
Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titer Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 0
RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>=0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.
Time frame: Day 0
Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 14
RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>=0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Modified formulation 2 (Medium) of Purified Vero Rabies Vaccine Serum Free
Modified formulation 3 (High) of Purified Vero Rabies Vaccine Serum Free
Commercialized formulation of HRIG
Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Time frame: Day 14
Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 28
RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>=0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.
Time frame: Day 28
Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 42
RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>=0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.
Time frame: Day 42
Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Month 7
RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>= 0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.
Time frame: Month 7
Geometric Mean Titer Ratio (GMTR) of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 7 Days Following Vaccination 3 (Day 14/Day 0)
RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. GMTRs were calculated as the ratio of GMTs 7 days post 3rd vaccination (i.e., on Day 14) and pre-vaccination on Day 0.
Time frame: Day 0 (pre-dose) and Day 14 (7 days post-dose 3)
Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 4 (Day 28/Day 0)
RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. GMTRs were calculated as the ratio of GMTs 14 days post 4th vaccination (i.e., on Day 28) and pre-vaccination on Day 0.
Time frame: Day 0 (pre-dose) and Day 28 (14 days post-dose 4)
Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 5 (Day 42/Day 0)
RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. GMTRs were calculated as the ratio of GMTs 14 days post 5th vaccination (i.e., on Day 42) and pre-vaccination on Day 0.
Time frame: Day 0 (Pre-dose) and Day 42 (14 days Post-dose 5)
Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 6 Months Following Last Vaccination (Month 7/Day 0)
RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. GMTRs were calculated as the ratio of GMTs 6 month post last vaccination on Month 7 and pre-vaccination on Day 0.
Time frame: Day 0 (Pre-dose) and Month 7 (6 Months Post Last Vaccination)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 0
Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.
Time frame: Day 0
Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 14
Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.
Time frame: Day 14
Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 28
Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.
Time frame: Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 42
Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.
Time frame: Day 42
Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Month 7
Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.
Time frame: Month 7
Number of Participants With Immediate Unsolicited Adverse Events
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and does not necessary have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An unsolicited AE was an observed AE that did not fulfill the conditions prelisted in the case report form (CRF) in terms of diagnosis and/or onset post-vaccination. All participants were observed for 30 minutes after any vaccination, and any unsolicited AEs occurred during that time were recorded as immediate unsolicited AEs in the CRF. Immediate AEs considered as related to vaccination were recorded as immediate unsolicited adverse reactions (ARs).
Time frame: Within 30 Minutes After any Vaccination
Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site Reactions
A solicited reaction (SR) was an AR observed and reported under conditions (symptoms and onset) prelisted (i.e., solicited) in the CRF and considered as related to vaccination. An AR was all noxious and unintended responses to a medicinal product related to any dose. Solicited injection site reactions included pain, erythema and swelling at and around the injection site.
Time frame: Within 7 Days After any and each vaccination (Vaccination 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic Reactions
A solicited reaction was an AR observed and reported under the conditions (symptom and onset) prelisted (i.e., solicited) in the CRF and considered as related to vaccination. An AR was all noxious and unintended responses to a medicinal product related to any dose. Solicited systemic reactions included fever, headache, malaise and myalgia.
Time frame: Within 7 Days After any and each vaccination (Vaccination 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
Number of Participants With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Events
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and does not necessary have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An unsolicited AE was an observed AE that did not fulfill the conditions prelisted in the CRF in terms of diagnosis and/or onset post-vaccination.
Time frame: Within 28 Days After any vaccination
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and does not necessary have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death; life-threatening; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect or a medically important event.
Time frame: From Day 0 up to Month 7